A writ petition was dismissed as not filed/prosperous due to the lack of representation from the petitioners at the hearing, despite being listed for dismissal.
None. The writ petition was dismissed by way of order as non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t\
[32s5 ]
I I i I I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
wRlT PETITION NO: 38099 OF 2012
Between
2 Solipuram Chandrakala. Wo Somi Reddy, Aged about 51 Years, Occ Household, Rio Boddugudem Village, Mothkur Mandal, NalgondaDistrict.
3 Sama Pushpaleela. W/o. Malta Reddy, Aged about 41 Years,Occ Household, R/o Ramanjapuram Village, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda Drstrict.
...PETITIONERS
AND
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlcle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to rssue an appropnate Writ, order or dtrection, more particularly one rn the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the inaction on thepart of the 3rd respondent Tahsildar rn not carrying out the mutation inrespect of Acs.3-23 guntas of land each ofpetrtroners 2 to 4 in Survey No.114 of Vardhamanukota Village as per the Memo of the 3rd respondent bearing No.8/65212012daled22- 05-2012 on the ground that the 4th respondent has mentionedthat he filed a sutt in O S No.74120'l 1 wrth I A No 23412011 on the file of Hon'bleSenior Civtl Judge Court, Suryapet, where under he only obtained the orderprohibiting the petrtioners 1 to 4 from alrenatrng the above land in total extent ofAcs.1 0-29 guntas. as illegal arbttrary and unconstitutional andquash thesame
(
i {
] {
t
{
consequentl), drrec: tl're respondents 1 to 3 to effect mulatror()f lhe names of the petitioners 2 to rl ir r{-.venue records rn respect of Acs 1 ) 2 3 g rntas of Iand, each an extent of Acs I ;13 guntas rn Survey No.1 14 of/arlh: manr kota Village, Arvapally [/]andal,,'lalgcnda Drstnct, notwithstanding the pen(Je rcy of the suit in O.S.No 74 of 201 cn the frle of the Hon'ble Senror Civrl Jrd!e Corrrt, Suryapet, Nalgonda Distnct
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012 WPME Nor4832a oF 20't2)
Petition und, rr Section 15.1 CPC praying that rn Ihe c r lu nstances stated in the affidavit f 1e I rn support of the petrtron the Hrgh Cotrt na1, be pleased drrect the resporrde nts to effect the mutation of the names of h(' petitioners 2 to 4 in revenue recor ls rn respect of Acs 10-29 guntas of land, errch an extent of Acs 3-23 guntas n Sr rvey No 1'14 of Vardhamanukota Vrllage A-vat)ally Mandal, Naigond a Distric:
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20 /l/PMP. NO: 52823 OF 2015)
Petition undt r riection 151 CPC praylng that ln tle circLl rn stil nces Stated in the affidavit frled rn support of the petltron the Hrgh OoLrt rnay b: pleased to amend the State of Telangana Rep by its Pnno[al Secr:tary, Revenue Department, Sec:re arrat. Hyderabad as 5th Respondelt rn \ry[) No. 38099 of 2012
Counsel for the Pel tioners: SRl. N. RAVI PRASAD
Counsel for the fte! pondents Nolto3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Rer pondents No_5:SRl. T. VENKAT RAJU GOUI)
Counsel for the Re: pondents No.4: None Appeared
The Court made th€ following: ORDER
,t
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR UIRIT PETITION No.3EO99OF 2OL2
ORDER
1'hough the matterwas listed on26.12 '2022and 1g.O4.2O23,there rvas no rcprcsenta[ion for the petitioners' I{cnce, thematter was dircctedto be listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' on24.O4.2023.
As a sequel, miscellancouspetitions, pending if anyin
this Writ Petitior-r,shall stand dismissed.No costs.
SD/.N.CHANDRASEKHARRAO ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIO FFICER
To, l.TwoCCstoGPFORREVEN(JE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana'at Hvderabad IOUTI , ij'"".,"cCi; 5n-rfu nnvtPRASADAdvocate[oPUc]^- 6 SliE 5E iIs"ni i'vrnxer nA.ru couo Advocate[oPUCl 4 TwoCD CoPtes
BIV
BS 8t^h'
HIGH CO JRT
DATED:2 1104t2023
| ORDER |
|---|
| WP.No.38rlggof2012 |
t 1 ,.i?lli
DISMISSlt\ c THE WRIT pETtTtON WITHOUT COSTS
9$c<br>@
r-c \r\r-r
Yarala Komura Reddy and Others
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
