Dismissed

Mrs. K.A.R. Prafulla Sridevi v. Sri M. Hanumantha Rao

Telangana HC21 Apr 2023CC/3057/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged willful disobedience of a High Court order directing the respondent Collector to consider a representation. The Court found no deliberate violation, noting the representation was accepted via classified post with intimation sent to the petitioner. Consequently, the contempt case was closed.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case is closed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the case are also closed.

Mrs. K.A.R. Prafulla Sridevi Vs Sri… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t³²⁵⁶¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3057 OF 2018

¶7

Contempt Case filed under sections 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act lo punish the respondents herein for willfully and Disobeying/deliberately/violating the Orders of the High Court dated 5/1/18 passed in |.A.NO. 1 OF 2017 in WP.NO. 45225 of 2O17

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mrs. K.A.R. Prafulla Sridevi, W/o.Vamsi Krishna Pisupati, A/a 31 years, residing at 3501 Bitchwood Terrace, Apt 215,Fremont, California, 94536 Represented by her GPA Holder K.A.R.L. Murthy, S/o.K.G.Rama Rao Aged 62years, Occ. Retried Employee R/o.Plot No.10, S.P. Colony,Trimulgherry, Secunderabad-50001 5.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Sri M. Hanumantha Rao, Collector, Sangareddy District Telangana.

¶13

...CONTEMNORS

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. GUDIPATI SRIDEVI

¶15

Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HON'3LE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDIIT)EF: KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.3O57 of2OL3

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

This^'ontempt case is filed alleging violatic r.r of the order passecl b,- his Courr in I.A.No.1 of 2OlT in W p,No 45225 of 2017, clatr d 05.01.2018, u,herein this Cour.t rlirc cted the rcspondcnt herein to considcr the represe tt.ltic,n dated 26.07.'2O L7 submitted bv the petitioner wirhir-r z, penod ol six u,eeks from rh c date of receipt of a copy of thc saic <. rdc r.

¶20

'lhr: espondent hcrein filed a courlte r- rLfl Lda,,it darecl 25.12.20 t9 stating that the representation of thr: pr:tit.oner r,t,as alrcadl c{)n ii(lercd by him and an endorsement u er:; is ;ucd vicle proceccling 1o.F11257412018, dated 18.12.,)Olg, ard a copv of thc samc is also scnt to the petitioner through I ei_;ist,rrecl post u,itlr a,.-kror lt dgment due, dated 20.L2.2O19, arLc. r, cclty of the s:rme is alsr placed before this Court.

¶21

3 ln hr light of the above, this Court does r,ot hncl any violatici.r.l he order passed by this Court nruch .e:;s clcliberate or ri,il [r r I vio :rtion.

¶22

The contempt case is accordingly closcd leaviug it opcr-r to lhe petitioner to take approi-ri:iate steps against the r:n<lc.rrscm.:n t

¶23

dat<:d 18. 12.2O18, if so advised.

¶24

Mis;ccllaneous Petitiotrs, if anv, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed.

¶25

SD/.T.SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR

To,

//TRUE COPY//

C]D

SECTION OFFICER

1 2 9nu Sri M. 99 Hanumantha^{ro SRt. GUDtpArr} Rao. C"jllgtg!.grlgareddy^snroevl Adro""iJr"oFijcjDistrict Tetangana. 3 Two CCs to Gp FOR neveNuE, Hish'C;rni;li;""sjlte of retangana louTl

4 Two CD Copies KKSW

HIGH COURI

DATED:21 10412023

'' _'- -=-.-
I E iiiri ?il?3

ORDER

CC.No.3057 ct 2018

CLOSING OF THE CC

.1
-l
ltt
t gb
?^ t\lz
l./

Mrs. K.A.R. Prafulla Sridevi v. Sri M. Hanumantha Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. K.A.R. Prafulla Sridevi v. Sri M. Hanumantha Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muzzamil Khan Vs State of Telangana And 5 Others

A. Ranjeeth Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Durga Agarwal Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sarath Babuji Projects Private Limited and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

M/s Sarath Babuji Projects Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sarath Babuji Projects Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana