In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged violation of an interim order. The Court was informed that the respondent had considered the case and passed an order. Finding no deliberate violation, the Court closed the case without costs.
Contempt case closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32561
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR-THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONgly, THE TWENry FOURTH DAy OF ApRtL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY iHCEE' -
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 406 0F 2023
contempt case fired under sections 10 to 12 0f contempt of courts Act to punish the respondents rrerern ro^rGtdu-tiv ";;;"iib;r;ry disobeyins rhe interim orders of the Hish court dated ,r3_t_ioi, ;;;# i; #.No. 2eloe ot 2022
Between:
JM Financial Asset Reconl trusteeor-LMrric-'iV;q!i;{:jbi9:T.,ilil.,if ;,,li"ll!%!,Jff er8fi:t?: A'J,llil;?ti,isn#aaa*"Hg,l,?varsr,,*x'#:5ti[T11f ,.,g,[i#
AND
...PETITIONER
Vamshi Mohan,, Mandal Re N;d;;,#;ffi ;'ffi ;;iI;J,"R1??,ISiJ,fl:..+':Hiff lJ_t/H8#Adarsh
...CONTEMNORYRESPONDENT
Counsel for the petitioner: M/S RUBAINA S KHATOON
Counsel for the Respondent: SRt B. MURALIDHAR AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the fo[owing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMIIVENI SUDHEER KTIMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.zt06 of 2o.23 ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed for alleged violation of the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.29l09 of 2022, dated. 13.O2.2022. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to the nodce of this Court by Sri B.Muralidhar, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue that pursuant to the order, dated L3.OT.2022, passed by this Court, the respondent has considered the case of the petitioner and passed an order ujde endorsement No.B/ggrr 2023, d,ated, Og.03.2023.
Miscellaneous petit.ions, if any, pending in this Conrempt Case shall stand closed.
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTYREGISTRAR /TTRUECOPY// qD
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. One CC to M/S. RUBAINA S KHATOON Advocate IOPUCI i irfi ;d"'i""bCion nLvE"r.rue,'nish Court for the State of Telansana tourl
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410412')23
/:. ...._l:: --
1 , r . ?i123
ORDER
CC.No.406 oflO23
CLOSING OF THECC WITHOUT C()STS
. , rtJ'4 ,--( * ,\r-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is deliberate violation of the interim order of this Court requiring the respondent to consider the petitioner's case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Trustee
Vamshi Mohan
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
