The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 37108 of 2015 for non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear or file representations on the date of listing deemed for dismissal.
Dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 37108 OF 2015
Between:
The A.P Diary Deveolpment Cooperation Federation Employees Association Office at Lalapet Hyderabad 5000'17 Rept by its authorised signitory Mr. Mallikarjuna Goud S/o Veerabadhra Goud, aged Major, Occ: Ryo Employee R/o FIat 202 Plot No.28 and 29 Near Sai Neha Hospital Comelot Layout Masjid Banda' Kondapur'84' Hyderabad'
...pETraoNER
AND
The Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Cooperation Federation (The A.P.D.D.C.F.Ltd) Represented by the Managing Director, Head Office At Lalapet, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners Association dated 9-9-2015 as illegal contrary to law ajudicial precedents, and right to employment and lively hood and consequently direct the respondents to take necessary action on the representation dt. 09.09.201 5 of the petitioners.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 47773 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent herein to take necessary decision on the representation of the petitioners association dated 9-9-20'15 pending the disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J.C.FRANCIS
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY
The Court made the following: OROER
/
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No. 37108 of 2015
ORDER:
On 12.09.2023, 2O.O9.2O23 and 25.09.2023, since there
was no representation for the petitioner, this Court directed the matter to be listed on 03.10.2023 under the caption "for dismissal".
Today also, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption "for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner either in the morning session or in the afternoon session. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for nor-r-prosecution
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISrRAR //TRUE COPY// Oi sEcfloN dfrrceR
To
1 One CC to SRI J.C.FRANCIS, Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRI AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY, Advocate [OPUC] 3 Two CD Copies
GJPPSK. ^\ff-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311012023
ORDER
WP.No.37108 of 2015
26 0tr :i,::)
'a.i:J
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
.l )5
The A.P Dairy Development Cooperation Federation Employees Association
The Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Cooperation Federation
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
