Raju Dharam Sothu,M.Sc, B.Ed, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 29274 OF 2013
Between:
(WP Dismissed in so far as Petitioner No.2 is concerned asper Court Order dt'1811112o13 in wP'MP' 39980/201 3)
...pETrrtoNERs
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or drrection moreparticularly a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actionof the 2nd respondentin issuing the guidelines vide Rc.No.D21997012110 dated 29.06.201 3for takingthe Teacher Posts on Contract Basis in Educational institutions tillqualifiedST candidates are available contrary to orders of Apex Courtin CivilAppeal No.6437 of 1998 dt.18.'12.1998 even though the G.O.Ms.No,275dt.05.1'l .1986 quashed by Apex Court as illegal, arbitrary, without anypoweror authority, unreasonable and violation of the fundamental rightsguaranteed to thepetitioners underArticles14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently directthe respondentsto
7
consider the case of the petitioners for Regularization in pursuance of the file pending before the Government.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 36370 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners for respective posts by staying paper notification dt.01 .07.2013 for recruiting new CRTs pending Regularization Proceedings pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201s(WVMP. NO: 4454OF 20151
Between:
AND
..,RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate interim orders made in W.P.M.P.No.36370 of 2013 in W.P.No.29274 of 2013 dated 09.10.201 3 and dismiss the wril petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GORLE GOPALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITIO N No. 29274of 2013
ORDER:
When the matter was taken-upforhearing onearlier occasions i.e.lI.O9.2O23 and19.09 '2023,there wasno representation for thepetitioners and lastly, on 26.09.2023 since there was no representation forthepetitioners,thisCourt directed the matter to be listed on 03 '1O '2023
"for dismissal".
Today, inspite of the matter beinglisted under the caption "for dismissal', there is norepresentationfor the petitionersin the morning and afternoon session.It seems that the petitioners are noL interested toprosecutethe matter.
Therefore, this writ petitionis dismissedfor non-prosecution' Miscellaneous applications, if any,pendingin this rvrit petition, shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// eo SECTION OFFICER
To
One CC to SRI GORLE GOPALAKRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC] .)1 Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 Two CD Copies
3 PSK. CJP ftn,-,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311012023
ORDER
WP.No.29274 of 2013
,{;i;il-:; ' (,)i. '
/.
ai...
:, 2 B [[T 2[?3
.o /
:. n .,4?
rli.,, -.. -.'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
?r".c,, \Ato*'
Raju Dharam Sothu
Vankudoth Baloji
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court