Petitioner claimed illegal termination without reinstatement under Article 14. Court found no representation on filing day and dismissed writ petition for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THETWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEA.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITIO NN O: 35819OF 2012
Between:
G. Narasa Raiu.. S/o G.Narasanna aged about 56 years, Occ:Assistant Enoineer (Und'er Suspension)Under Deputationto GHtvlC' Hyderaba-dO/o A.pi. Statd lrrigation' DevelopmentCorporation R/o H No' H-26 Sarada nesioeniv, Ftit tto.tozMbdhuranagdr, SanjeevaReddy Nagar P'o' Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or directionmore pa(icularlyone in the nature of writ tf "Certiorari" calling for the recordsrelating to Proc'No' tDc/tvlD/EE/HRD/ASO1/201',l-20121159Cdated 5-10-2012 issued by the 1st respondent and set asidethe sameas illegal, arbitrary, unjust and withoutany basis and contraryto Article 14 of the constitution of lndia andconsequently direct the respondentsto re-instate the petitioner into service immediately
l.A. NO: 1OF 20 12(WPMP.NO:45 536 0F 20121
Petition under section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High court may be pleasedto suspend theproc .No IDC/MD/EE/HRD/ASOI /2O1 1 -20121 159Cdated5-1O-2O12 issued by the 1st respondentand further direct the respondentsto re-instatethe petitioner into service forthwith
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. D. RAMAKRISHNA
Counsel for the RespondentsNo.1: SRl. MOHD MOINAHMED QUADRI Counsel for the RespondentsNo.2&3:SRl. D. NARSIMULU The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
T}{E IIOII'I}t,E SRI.IT]STICE A. ABHISIIEK ITEDDY \ Vltll' PETITION No. 35819 of 2012
ORDtrR:
On ll5 01.202:1, u,[rcrr the present \/rit f'cr ition u'as taken up. it r^35 5131",1 across the Barthat Sri M. Ratna Reddy, learned co,Ln;el ror thc petitioner, has expired, as such, the Registry rvas directed to send notice to the petitiorer'. Pursuant to the said o der ol'this CloLrrt dated 25.01 .2023, the F.egistry has sent a n, )ttcc to the pctitioner. However, the ..aid notice was returrr,:cl un-servcd on the petitioner on lhe grrund that no such person n thc adcircss, to ivhich, it was sent, an(l tLrere is a postal enrl.rr: clucnl to tltat cf-flct. Having regard to the same, on 17.()4.-l() li. this( ourt u hile adjourning the mrfter to 25.04.2A2:i, ras ilirectc',:l rhc Rcgistry to print the nlm: of the petition!-r in lrc cuusc list. I'oday, the name,.rf the petir ioner is printed in th'carrsc Iist. bLrt. there is no representalior for the petltroner.
Ilavrn:. r'egard to thc above, this Court is o[1he opinion tliat thc pcti i()ncr is not intcrcsted to pursue tl-re pl.cst:nt Writ Petition
i\AR, J w.I'.No.3-i6 19 ot 201.1
2
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disrnissed for
non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.V.KAVITHA
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER
To,
q
t
i i i I I I Ii I B I t i r Fl t: i i :
,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510412023
ORDER
WP.No.35819 of 2012
<br>t l)
r-)
a "<br>\a. 9'..:
s\ '7
\.' )
\,'t l,l
?<br>,
\ c:iiy
c( i/
_l/
.=/2
i+.*w:
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSt :CUTION WITHOUT COSTS;
?)"^4
,c3
G. Narasa Rao
Andhra Pradesh State Irrigation Development Corporation
Justice A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
