Contempt petition filed alleging willful disobedience of a 2021 order. Court found respondent had issued an endorsement enabling the petitioner to file her grievance. Contempt case closed.
Contempt case closed. Mở leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Tahsildar in terms of the endorsement dated 24.04.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD
MONOAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPT ASE :15 F 2022
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for their willful and disobedience of the Orders of the High Court dated: 8-1'l -2021 passed in W .P. 27 87 7 121.
Between:
Ms. K.V.N.V. Bharathi Devi, W/o. Rev. K.V.K. Rao, aged about 58 years, Rl/o. Plot No. 102, High Court Judges Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad - 500 070.
...PETITIONEFYPETITIONER
ANO
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RUSHEEK REDDY K V
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H( )N'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEKITI;DIIY
CONTEMPT CASE No.1559 of 2022
ORDER:
-l'hrs Cont'nrpr (-2ca is lilecl alleging willful disol;cc]iencc of the ordcr da(eri A8.) 12021 pzrssr:d by this Court in Writ lr: ition N<t.27877 ol 2O2l
When the mat:er is Lakerr up for hearing, the le artLed Govcrnment Plead,:r lor Ilev rnuc has stated that in obedience t(,rhe ord( r dated 08. 1 1.202 lrar sr:d b_v this Court in W.P. No.2787",' cl 2021 , the Tal'rsildar, IbraL inlpi.rtnam Mandal, has issued Enclorse lner,t No.Bl637 I 2023 daterl -.+. ),. .2O2?, rcquesting the petitioner Lo ;rpprcach thc saicl authoritv 'vitl-r ,upportive documcnts in order to guic r: hel in filing her grievancc in [)l arani Porr-al under the relevant modlt]t: lo- redressal of hcr g,ricvar rct . A cc,pv r.rf the said endorsement is als r rla,red on record by t he learnerl iovernment Pleader.
In vieu r,f the abovc, the Contempt Case is closcd lr:aving it open to the petiticr)( r to approach the Tahsildar, Ibrahiml>a tnam Mandal, in terrns of endrr,emcnt daLed 24.O4.2023, referred suprzr.
Misct:ll:rr.er>us petiLions pending in this v'rit prrti,ion, if any, shall
srand Closed. 'J(. costs.
\
j;''*?" $IXA"'A'ill 1: IITRUECOPY// SiECTIONCiFFICER
HIGH COUR T
DATED:24t0412023
ORDER
.1--ii :, i . =':..
.
I
1l 5 ,ti;r 2ii?3
<br>
CC.No.155lt of 2022
CLOSING HE C.C
\o P{"<br>11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has willfully disobeyed the High Court order dated 08.11.2021 in W.P. No. 27877 of 2021 requiring her to approach the Talukadar with supportive documents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. K.V.N.V. Bharathi Devi
Sri M. Jagadeeswar
Ms Anitha Reddy
Sri Venkata Chary
Sri Amoy Kumar
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
