The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 35574 of 2013 as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer existed.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 I
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEA.ABHISHEKREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 35574 OF 2013
Between:
R. Beeraiah, S/o. Sailu, aged about26 years, Additional Field Assistant, under District Water ManagementAgency,at JammapurVillage,Pangal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot theConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavitfiled therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue an order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actionof the respondents in not making the payment of the agreed remunerationto the petitioner, thoughthe petitioner havebeen discharging his duties as AdditionalField AssistanV Rojgar Seva at Jammapur Village, Pangal Mandal, MahabubnagarDistrictwith effect from13-04-201'land in asking thepetitioner not to attendthe duty without any notice and opportunity, as illegal, unlavvful, contrary tolaw and consequentlydirect the respondentsto permit the petitioner to continue to work as Additional FieldAssistant/Rojgar Seva at Jammapur village underDistrict WaterManagementAgency' Mahabubnagar andpay thepending monthly salary of the petitioner w.e.f.13-04-
2011 and continue to pay the same as long as the petitioner is discharging his duties as Additional Field Assistant.
t.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO:44205 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as Additional Field Assistant/ Rojgar Seva at Jammapur Village, Pangal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, and pay his monthly remuneration as agreed by the respondents at the time of appointment of the petitioner with effect from 13.O4.2O11, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. DAMODAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRl. S. RAMAKRISHANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3: SMT. R. PADMA REKHA (SPL C MGNREGS)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHTSHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.35574 of 2O13
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not
survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the above made submission, the present writ
petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any shall also stand
dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
sD/- c. PRAVEeT rulan ASSISTANT REGIgfRAR / sEcTtoN oFFtcER
//TRUE COPYII
To,
i I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610312023
ORDER
WP.No.35574 of 2013
-r.l) . H !:i ,^ii-
1..; :.
,} '<br>) 1 I APfl 2023
I
\r-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
€
(.,
R. Beeraiah
The Mandal Development Officer
The Project Director
The Assistant Project Director
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
