Disposed

M/s. Dr. G. Jagath Reddys Bio Science Proprietary Concern v. E. Venkata Narasimha Reddy

Telangana HC15 Mar 2023CC/2082/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a contempt case alleging violation of a prior order, noting compliance. The court closed the case without passing a punishment order, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the respondent's subsequent order at the appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed with no punishment imposed; petitioner left at liberty to challenge respondent's order before the appropriate forum.

M/s. Dr. G. Jagath Reddys Bio Science Proprietary… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAR.CH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2082 OF 2022

¶6

Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents who are willfully disobeying the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court dated 14.07.2021inW.P. No. 15918of 2021.

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. Dr. G. Jagath Rg4.dy's Bio Science Proprietary Concern, Rep. by its froprietor^{D! G.JagathReddy, Hindu, s/o. Late G. Janga Reddy,agbd a-bout} 9.6 .years,^{Occ. Business,8-2-6B4l3lBG/45,Road No.12, Banjara Hills,} Hyderabad.

¶9

..PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

E. Venkata Narasimha Reddy, S/o. not known to the petitioner, Managing Director, The Telangana State lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad.

¶12

Bellamkonda Madhavi, Wo, not known to the Petitioner, The Zonal Manager, TS I I C, Kukatapa I ly Zonal Office, Ku katpal ly, Hyd erabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. AKELLA PADMA

¶15

Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: Sri L. PRABHAKAR REDDY(SC FOR TSIIC) The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

¶16

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHTSHEK REDDY

¶17

CONTEMPT CASE No.2082 of 2022

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

Alleging violation of the order dated 14.07.2021 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.15918 of 2021, the present

¶20

Contempt Case has been filed.

¶21

Respondents have filed counter stating that pursuant to the aforesaid order of this Court, the petitioner was put on notice dated 25.01-2023 and necessary orders were passed by

¶22

the respondent No.2 on 09.03 .2023.

¶23

Having regard to the above, this Contempt Case is

¶24

closed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order

¶25

dated 09.03.2023 passed by the respondent No.2 before the

¶26

appropriate forum, if he is so aggrieved.

¶27

Sd/- CH.^{VENKATESWARLUJ} DEPUw neci6riln '1

//TRUE^COPY"

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

One CC to^{M/s. A. PADIvIA,Advocate[OPUC]}

¶33

z. one cc to^{sri L. PRABHAKARREDDY(sc FoR Tsilc), Advocate [opuc]}

¶34

Two CD Gopies

\ r,jb

kam

HIGH COURT

DATED:15/03/2023

STATT'
-<br>o:)() I B Nefl ts8
$
*

¶41

ORDER

¶42

CC.No.2082 ot 2022

¶43

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

M/s. Dr. G. Jagath Reddys Bio Science Proprietary Concern v. E. Venkata Narasimha Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Dr. G. Jagath Reddys Bio Science Proprietary Concern v. E. Venkata Narasimha Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Pavan Kumar.R.R.Dist. Vs Secty.,Union of INDIA.N.DELHI.AND4 Others.

Smt.B.Lakshmi Bai. Vs Secty.,S.a.P.Finance DEPT,HYD.AND4 Others

Ulli Sampath alias Vulli Sampath Vs Sri Prashnth Jeevan Patil,and another

R. Beeraiah Vs The Mandal Development Officer

G. Srinivas, Vs The Regional Manager

M. Gunavathi, Vs The Chairman and Managing Director, Air India Limited