The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 32684 of 2013 for non-prosecution, holding the petitioner had abandoned the challenge to an order dismissing his review petition seeking reinstatement.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF IUARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 32684 OF 2013
Between:
G. Srinivas, S/o Late Narayana (E. No. 650991), Aged about:44 Years, Occ: RTC Employee, Resident of Qrt. No.'l 3, APSRTC Quarters, Ward No.l , Siva Nagar, Narasampet, Warangal District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under hrticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated I in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned order of the Respondent No. 1 in dismissing the review petition vide Proc. No. PA/19-R(25y2013-RM.WL, dated 17.1O.2013 is illegal, brbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently by setting aside the impugned drder of the 1 st respondent, daled 17 .10.2013, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice.
!.A.NO:1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO:40642 OF 2013)
Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to reconsider the review petition of the petitioner a fresh filed on 29.05.20'13 pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.M.JANARDHAN RAO Counsel fsr the Respondents : SRI.KALLAKURI SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following ORDER
I
THE I ON'BLESRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK R[:DD' WRIT PETI N .32 of2 1
ORDER:
On 24.12 2023,whenthe present Writ Petitiol!v'lstaken up' therewaSrlo-e]resentationonbehalfofthelearneclt:rlunsr:lforthe petitioner, as ut-h, thepresent WritPetition was direct€(lto be posted under the crption 'For Orders' on 07'03'2023'--hlreafter'on 09.03.2023, virenthe matter was taken up, tl€rre wasno representatiorr,nbehalrofthelearnedcounselforthepletltioner. Havingregerdt()thesame,thisCourthasdirecterdtheltr:gistrytolist thepresent Vr.it Petition on 16.03.2023 under tho caption'For Dismissal'.Ev :n today, there is no representation on Irehtrlf of the learned cou nsrl 'or the petitioner.
Havirlg-eqard tothe above, this Court is of the c'[)]niollthat the petitioner is n, t nterested topursuethe present Writl)€til ion'
Acco-di rgly, thepresentWrit Petition is dismissedfor
non-prosecuti,n
Miscr:ll; nr:ous applications, if any pending,shall s:arrd< losed.
I /
SD/.N.SRIHARI ASI;II;TI.NT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYII ClI) SECTION OFFICER
To
1 OneCCto S ll M ANARDHAN RAO, Advocate [OPI,,O] 2 One CC to S tl KALLAKURISRINIVASA RAO, Advot;at': [OPUC] 3 Two CD C,rp es, SA SB w.
I I I i i i I ii I
HIGH Cor.rt lT
I DATED:1611t312023
--.-:=
t/
'! 1 5 [?a ?0?3
ORDER
WP.No.326l4.o 2013
DISMISSIN(i THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION
WITHOUT C OSTS.
r-)
-------
fz"ll r
'- a -l I\t .\ t19-
G. Srinivas
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Warangal Region
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
