Writ petition challenging non-issuance of Government Order for B.Sc B.Ed course recognition. Petitioners claimed illegal status due to lack of notification despite NCTE recognition. Court noted respondents had issued relevant Government Order making relief infructuous.
Dismissal of Writ Petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32561
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 35094 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of lheConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ or an order or a direction,more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaringthe actions of the Respondentsin not issuing an aipropriate GovernmehtOrder notifying B.Sc B.Ed four year (integrated) course with 50 students intakein favour of the Petitioner undersection20 0f the
Telangana Educatio r Act,'1982 in pursuance of recognitio I granted by the National Coun<;il lor Teacher Education (NCTE) from acarle nic year 2016-11 onwards in spite o':he Petitioner receiving Provisronal a filizrtion from the Palamuru University ar; being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutic nal and contrary to the provisions of the (lTE Act, 1993 and settled position of arv laid down by the Division Bench of thi; Honble High Court vide Common Ord:r daled 06.O1 .2017 in W.A.No.1041',1424. 1435, 143A, 1441 ,1444, 1446 and.292,tf 20i6 and to issue a consequent al direction to the Respondents to fo111yr,16 include the Petitioner No.2 Coll< g<: in the process of counselling for B.Sr - B.Ed four years (integrated) course 5 ) students intake for the academic year 2022.2023 onwards by duly passing an rppropriate Government order in favorrr of the petitioners under section 20 of 1re Telangana Education Act,'1g82 in view of the recognition granted by the NCTE.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2022
Petition Uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit frlerJ ir r;upport of the petition, the High Cour rray be pleased to direct the Responder rt No. 1 to issue the Government Orcler n,rtifying B.Sc B.Ed four year (integrated )(;ourse with 50 students intake n favrrur ol the petitioner within 3 days pendin, I ciisposal of the above writ petition.
|.A.NO:2 OF 2022
Petition tJndel Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavitriled it :;upport of the petition, the High Cour. rray be pleased to permit the Petitioner No.2 College to admit S0 students in Et.S;c; B.Ed four year (integrated) course f orn the academic year 2O22-2023 onwe rcls by including the Petitioner No.2 Ool ege in the DOST Web Counselting frr allotment and admission and throur h spot admissions, pending disposal of th,: wit petition.
Counsel for the Petil ioners : SRI.AVINASH DESAI
Counsel for the Resl rondent No.l : GP FOR HIGHER EDUC,\llOt{
Counsel for the Resl rondent Nos.2 & 4 : SMT.P.SARADA
Counsel for the Resl rondent No.3 : SRI.K.JAGADEESHWAR REDr)y
The Court made the 'ollowing ORDER
I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MIIMMINEM SUDHEER I(I'MAR WRIT PETITION No.35 O94 ot 2022
ORDER:
It is represented by learned counsel for the petitioners that the respondents have already issued Government Order covering the subject matter of the writ petition and as such the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed
SD/. C. PRAVEEN K AR ASSISTANT REGI
/ffRUE COPY//
SECTION FICER
To
S.A
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:07106t2023
ORDER
WP.No.35094 of 2022
i
4'
4it;ia
.\f.( t
I
tJ ? F Jri\ 2023 I I
.,i.
\t ,
DISMISSING''I'HE W.P
AS INFRUCTL OUS WITHOUT COSTS.
fiD a)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking a Government Order for B.Sc B.Ed course recognition is infructuous.
Whether the refusal to include the petitioner college in counselling for B.Sc B.Ed course is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Vivekananda Educational Society and Others
State of Telangana
The Telangana State Council of Higher Education
Palamuru University
The Convenor, Degree Online Services Telangana (DOST)
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
