Disposed

Durgam Ramu , v. The State of Telangna

Telangana HC6 Jun 2023WP/274/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered the closure of Writ Petition No. 274 of 2023 without costs. The petition, originally filed for admission to the Law Cet 2022-23 with a police certificate, was disposed of as the petitioner had already obtained admission into a three-year LLB course pursuant to an interim order dated 04.01.2023.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is closed without costs and miscellaneous petitions pending in it shall stand closed.

Durgam Ramu , Vs The State of Telangna — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 274 OF 2023

¶7

Between

¶8

Durgam Ramu, S/o. Ramji, Age 25 Years, Occ. Student, R/o, H.NO. 1-2711, ST Colony, Koutala(V), and (M), Komaram Bheem Asifabad District

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'l . The State of Telangna, Rep by its Principal Secretary (Higher Education Department ) Secretariat, at Hyderabad

¶12

The Law Cet Conviner, Osmania University Hyderabad.

¶13

Mahthamgandhi Law Collages ,, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. (RR Dist) rep by it's Principal

¶14

Aurora Leggal Sciences Academy,, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad, rep by it's Principal

¶15

Bhasker Law College,, moinabad, Ranga Reddy Distrcit, rep by it's Principal 6. Viswabahrathi College, of law Muthangi (V) Patancheru (M), Sanga Reddy District. rep by it's Principal.

¶16

Anatha Law College, Sumitranagar,Kukatpally,Hyderabad rep by it's Principal. ...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to lssue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declare the in action of the respondent No. 2 to direct the unofficial respondents to allow the petitioner to certificates verifications and to take admission in Law-Cet 2022-23 in unofficial respondents colleges to^participoatc and get admission with police certificates and duplicate will submit after^gefting admission in short after getting from the boards concerned is illegal , arbitrary and violating the natural^justice , FURTHER direct the respondent NO. 2 to direct the unofficial respondents to allow the petitioner to participate certificates verifications and to take admission in Law-Cet 2022-23 with^police certificate with a undertaking to produce at alter time.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under Sr:ction 1 51 CPC praying that in the cir<;urnst ances stated in the affidavit filerj rn s rp lort of the petition, the High Court ntal tre pteased to direct the respondent NC). ll tc direct the unofficial respondents to e lk.,w the petitioner to participate certificate , verifications and to take admission in Litw -C:t 2022-23 with police certificate w th a undertaking to produce at alter time penr.ling disposal of the above writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Peti ioner : SRl. G L NARASIMHA RAO

¶21

Counsel for the Res )ondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCT,TION\

¶22

Counsel for the Res rondent No.2 : Ms C VANI REDDY SC FOlt OSMANIA UNIVERSITY Counsel for the Res )ondent Nos.3 to 7 : NONE APPEARED

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE IION'BLE SRI WSTICE MT'MMINENI^{SUDIIEERI(UMAR} WRIT PETITION No.274 of 2O23

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

It is represented that pursuant to the interim^{orderpassed by} this Court on 04.O1.2O23 in W.P.No.274 of^{2023, the petitionergot} admission into LLB three^years course and^{she is pursuingthe} sarne

¶27

In view of the same, no further orders^{needbe perssed} in this Writ Petition and accorclingly, the^{Writ Petition is ckrsed. No} costs

¶28

Miscelianeous petitions, if any,^{pending in this writ petitior)}

¶29

shall stand ciosed.

¶30

SD/. K. AMMAJI

¶31

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcfloN d#rrcen

¶32

To, 1. The Principal Secretary^{(Higher Education Department} )^{State of Telangna,} Secretariat, at Hyderabad

¶33

The Law Cet Conviner,^{Osmania University Hyderabad.}

¶34

The Principal Mahthamgandhi^{Law Collages} ,^{L.B.Nagar,Hyderabad.} (RR Dist)

¶35

The Principal Aurora Leggal^{SciencesAcademy' Bandlaguda, Hyderabad'}

¶36

The Principal, Bhasker^{Law College, moinabad, Ranga Reddy Distrcit'} .- - 6. The Principal, Viswabahrathi^{College, of law Muthangi (V) Patancheru (M)'} Sanga Reddy District.

¶37

The Principai, Anatha Law^{College, Sumitranagar,Kukatpally,Hyderabad'}

¶38

One CC to SRl. G^{L NARASIMHARAO,Advocate.[OPUC]}

¶39

Two CCs to GP^{FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ,High Court for the State of} Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶40

10.one cc to vs c vANl^{REDDY SC FOROSMANIA UNIVERSITY.[OPUC]} 11.Two CD Copies

SB GJP {w-

HIGH COURT

DATED:06106,2023

ORDER

WP.No.274 o12023

...-=+
./ ,vt s l'.q rA
,e
6 jil,l ?023
,:

¶47

CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTON WITHOUT CC STS

¶48

r [-a
t ')'
\ 0
')p $u

Durgam Ramu , v. The State of Telangna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durgam Ramu , v. The State of Telangna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. J.P. Pharmacy, Vs The I.C.I.C.I Bank

Khairunnissa Begum Vs The Regional Pass port office

Kethireddy Jayamma Vs The Government of India

Development and Welfare Association of the Blind Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Prof. Dr.Gali Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

D. Lingaiah Vs The Union of India