The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 34689 of 2015 as infructuous. Counsel for the petitioners and respondents agreed that the subject matter had become without cause of action.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 34689 OF2015
Between
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, orderor direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof writ of Mandamus declaring theactionof the 3rd respondent in registering the crime in FIR No. 17112015basing on the complaint lodgedby the 4th respondent without proper investigation as illegal, arbitrary andviolative of principlesof natural justice and consequentlyquash the same.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(f Prl,lP. NO: 44557 OF 20151
Petition und-.r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ rrnslances stated in the affidavit fileri ir s rpcort of the petition, the High CoLrt ma' l,e tleased to stay all further proce,edrrg s n Crime No.'l 71 of 2015 on the file ol t're :ird respondent including arresl of 1l-e prslilisnsp5 pendrng disposal of WP
Counsel for the P()lil ioners : SRl. D BHASKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Rr>:;t rondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI SAI RAM AGP I;,lR IIOME
Counsel for the Rr:r;r rondent No.4: Ms KAVITHA REP. SRI M li:AM MOHAN REDDY
The Court made the 'ollowing: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.34689 of 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepeLitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of the writpetition has become infructuous and requests for dismissal.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this writ
petition, shall also stand closed.
To
AssrsrAiiht'G:S+S^T
//rRUE coPY//
.ECIRNoFFICER
s 31,"""#i;s'Rr.rvinnrtl MoHAN REDDY' Advocate'[oPUCl
I
SB G.t"N-
HIGH COURI
DATED:1210( 12023
ORDER
i U t 't''it NtI
<br>
WP.No.346ti9 of 2015
DISMISSING I'HE WRIT PETTION AS INFRUCI'IJOUS WITHOUT COSTS
(r-) i^1D i,i\u,>4
Hanmandla Kanukaiah
Anuradha
The State of Telangana
Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Manakondur PS
Hanmandla Saradha
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
