High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Cr.P.C. Sections 437, 438, 439, and 482 as infructuous because the underlying case was already concluded by an order of acquittal dated 13.09.2017. No separate relief was granted.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e9 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1,1476 OF 2014
Between:
...PETtTrON ERyACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Cou( may be pleased topleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.94712014 on the file of the court of Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and pass
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20 1 4tCRLPMP. NO: 15282 OF 20141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.94712014 on the file of the court of Xl tvletropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition before this Honourable court
This Petition ccming on for hearrng,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G VIJAYA SARADHI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (fG) on behatf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri K. Durga Prasad Advocate for the Respondent No.'1
The Court made the following: ORDER
,/:
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
4
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14476of 2oL4
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioners/accusedNos'1 and2 submits that the cause in the CriminalPetition does not survive and hence seeks to dismissthe same as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, lf any,pending in this criminal
petition, shall also stand dismissed.
//TRUE COPY//
SDLP.PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR L]D
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:12 tO6t2O23
/'- --=:1:-:=:-.-1'l! ;i': 1 ri t.
,/ ,,'' ( ),,1::i<br>'i )
t:-
l.,,,'-. 1 1 ,lut 2[23
ii.' .)
CRLP.No.14476 oI 2014
DISD. As TNFRUCTOUS
O*r;
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed for bail/quashing remains maintainable given that the underlying case was disposed of by acquittal.
Whether the High Court should dismiss the criminal petition as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Miryala Madaneswar and Smt. Miryala Rama Devi
Miryala Venkataramana
The State of A.P.
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
