The High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings in a previous case. The court held that the cause of action no longer existed because the underlying case (PRC No. 5 of 2014) had already been disposed of on January 17, 2019.
Criminal Petition No. 12159 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
[32ee ]
N/ONDAY, THE TWELFTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:12159 OF 2014
Between L Surender Kumar loshi, S/o Sri O.p.Joshi, Aged 43 years, Occ: Business, Rl o 2-3- 289 /290. Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad L Sandeep Kumar loshi, S/o O.p.loshi, Aged 38 years, Occ: Business, Rl o 2-3-289 /290, Ramgopatpet, Secundera bad Petitioners/Atcused- 10 & 1 1 And t State of Telangana, Represented bypublic prosecutor of t.lign Court, Hyderabad ... Respondent/Complainant
L ?LUIT1 Nancharamma,W/o p.VenkateshwarRao, Aged 38 years, R/o H.no. ptot No.204-8, Siddardha Apartments, Ramanthapuram, Hydercr barj .. Respondent/Defacto Com pla ina n t
<s*{,-
\
I ! Ii - i I i I I I
Petrtiorr u r:l r Section.182 of Cr.P.C praying th rt rr l r cir(;lrrstances stated in the l"4er r<: andum of C;rounds of Criminal Petiliorr, tl: llrrlh Court may be pleased to qt-asf r :,€, PRC No. 5 of 2014 before the llorr'bl: (ll Additional Chief lr4etropclit:rn l,4a, rs1 a e, Nampzrlly, Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1OF 20 :ll?LPMP. NO: 12454 OF 2014)
Petition urrrjr r Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying thitt n th€ circrunrstances stated in the l,4enrc,, rlndum of Grounds of Criminal Petr ror, tlri: Hig:h Court rnay be pleased to grant ;t: y all further proceedings including )ersor itl ap:ear:rnce of the petitioners in PIIC lrlo. 5 of 2014 before the Hon'b er Xll l,ddrtional Chief Metropolita n tr4agist ale, Nampally, Hyderabad.
This Pr:tit,rn crming on for hearing,upon perrrsirg :hr: Nlemorandum of Grounds of Crim,ne retition and upon hearing the argr m(rnrs cf [Vs. Sagarika Koneru for Sri f,urr odar l\4undra, Advocate for therelitiorr rs and the Public Prosecutor or br: h.-" f lf the Respondent. The Court made :h( fr>llowing: ORDER
I I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.12159 of 2OL4
ORDER:
Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned cour rsel representing Sri Damodar Mundra, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.10 and 11 submits that the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive and hence seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous.
r,
Mrs<r lli n3rlus pciitions. rf an1 , pen(linl rr) tlris cr inrrnirl
l)etition.slriL[ :,tandclosed
//TRUE COPY//
S D/. V. KAVITHA ASSiII:;TANT REGISTRAR ( tt) SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 The Xll Adcil rtrral Chief l\4etropolitan Magistrate , Nampal y. l-lyderabad. 2 The S-tzrtion ' ruse Officer, Police Station, CCs, DD, .1yrle ibiri 3 Two COs tr t e Public Prosecutor, High Court for the 5tat,: of Telanqana at Hyderabac' )LlTl 4 One CO tc ll il. DAIr/ODAR N4UNDRA Advocate lOpUOl Two CD C'r, :s
CHR
q
lr
HIGH COUR I-
DATED:121Ui|2023
.::
.: ,l
. i ,\]\ ?$E i,. il
i;l
ORDER
CRL.P.No .121 !i9 of 201 4
DISMISSING I-HE CRL.P. AS INFRUCT.JOUS
b ialza
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition challenging the quashing of prior proceedings survives as the underlying case has been disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L Surender Kumar loshi
L Sandeep Kumar loshi
State of Telangana
L Nancharamma
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
