The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the parties had reached a compromise, rendering no further orders necessary.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3219 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENl
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 3457 OF 2015
Between:
Peddi Madhavi, W/o. late P. Rajnikar Reddy, aged about 56 years, R/o. Nangnoor village 8s Mandal, Medak District.
...PETITIONER
AND
.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to assue an appropriate wnt, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly the respondent no.4 herein in deputing his officials to lay the pipe lines under Lift lrrigation Scheme through the Patta Land belonging to the petitioner in Sy. No 520tAa (Ac.4-18 Gts), Sy. No. 522 (Ac. 1-04 Gts), Sy No 523 (Ac. 1-26 Gts), Sy. No. 524 (Ac. 2-00 Gts) & Sy. No. 525(Ac. 1-35 Gts) situated in Nangnoor village and Mandal, Siddipet Revenue Division, Medak district. Telangana as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of Article 226 cf lhe Constitution of lndia and against the principles of naturaljustice.
l.A. NO: I OF 2015( WPMP. NO:4598 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased togrant interim stay directing the respondents. more particularly the respondent No.4 herein not to proceed further in laying pipe lines under Lift lrrigation Scheme through the Patta lands belonging to thepetitioner in Sy. No. 520/Aa(Ac. 4-18 Gts). Sy. No.522 (Ac.r-04 Gts), Sy No.523 (Ac. 1-26 Gts), Sy No.524 (Ac.2-00 Gts) & Sy No 525 (Ac 1-35 Gts) situated in Nangnoor viilage and [vlandal, Siddipet Revenue D vision. Medak District, Telangana in the interest ofjustice as otheMise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury.
l.A. NO:2 OF 201S(WPMP. NO:9383 OF 2015)
Between:
Peddi Madhavi, W/o late P. Rajnikar Reddy, aged about 56 years, R/o. Nangnoor village & Mandal, MedaK District.
...PETITIONER
AND
(Respondent No.5 is added as party respondent per the directions of the Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P No 4598/2015 daled 24.O2.2O15).
...RESPONDENTS
Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sllpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
Permit the petitioner herein to add Andhra Pradesh state lrrigation Development Corporation Ltd. (Telangana Unit) as respondent No.5 since the above corporataon is a necessary party to the above writpetition.
l.A. NO: 5 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 19695 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the orders of stay dated 24-02-2015 granted in WP.MP No. 4598i2015 in W.P.No. 345712015 till the disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice.
LA. NO: 7 OF 201S(WPMP. NO:42349 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the office to post WP MP No 19695 of 2015 in WP No. 3457 of 2015 as early as possible and otherwise if the matter is posted after two weeks, the respondents herein may anytime complete the digging operations and start layingpipelines in the land belonging to thispetationer.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAHMOOD ALI
counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. SHIVA KUMAR, S.C. FOR TSIDC
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'IILE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.3457 of 2015
ORDER:
Learned couns;el for the petitioner submitted that the parties have since compromised, no further orders are necessary and prays for closure of the Writ Petition.
In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed
as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand
closed.
SD/-G.SIREESHA
ro,
ASSISTANT REGIST,NAR //TRUE COPY// u ./ sEcTtoN drrtcen
MP BS
BSh.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810112023
S lA.
l-r
o-) [ 1 Hi\t 2023
ORDER
WP.No.3457 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
T ouJ,>
tssh F<t"-lB ,
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Peddi Madhavi
The State of Telangana
P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
