The High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No. 27468 of 2021, where the petitioner sought observation under Article 226 regarding the nomination of members by the State under the Andhra Pradesh Medical Practitioners Registration Act.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e ]
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 27468 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Healthcare Reforms Doctors Association, a Society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 bearing Registration No. 581 of 2017 and having its office at Plot No. 222, Road No. 14, Brundavan colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad-35, rep. its President/Authorised representative, Dr. K. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Sri. K. Veeraiah, aged about 39 years, R/o. Plot No.222, H.No. 10-6-229, Road No. 14, Brindavan colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad- 500 035
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition ur der Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi;tpraying that inthe crrcumstances sl ated in the affidavit filed therewiththe Hrgh Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of Wri : of Mandamus directing the1st responden tonominatethesax members under Section 3(2Xc) of the Andhra Pradesh lledical Practitioners Registration Act, 968 (Act No. 23 of 1968).
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition un ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir(iurnstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of thepetition, the High Court ma) bepleasedto direct Respondents No. 3 to 8 not to discharge any functions of the il"d Respondent who have been nomin; rted Lrnder Sectaon 3(2)(c) of the said Act
Counsel for the F etitioner: SRI SAMA SANDEEP REDDY
Counsel for the F espondent No.1: THE ADDITIONAL ADVO,:ATE GENERAL GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH AND I:AMILY WELFARE
Counsel for the F espondent No.2: SMT. A. DEEPTHI
Counsel for the F espondent Nos.3 to 8: -
The Court made I he following: ORDER
I l
\
il
I
I
I
I I
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.27468 of 2O21
ORDER:
Learned counser for the petitioner submitted that the rerief sought for by the petitioner has already been redressed and the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and it has become infructuous and prayed for closure of the Writ petition.
In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to cosrs.
Miscellaneous applications, il any pending, shail also stand closed.
SDI.C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// c4) SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1. One CC to SRI SAMA SANDEEP REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]
MP
BS
-ilGr{ couRT
D ATE l-).t :'l 8 I O 1 I 2023
1 $as
!ir !rA
(?
o.E
O i: 2 r[B ?0?3
),a.
\",,
,i, *..'//
. i'I. rFA'il:
ORDER
WP.No.i!7'468 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WI?}TPETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITIiIOUT COSTS
c(: (Ilc.de
{\k
v)
l1 <br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking nomination of Sax members should be considered in light of the relief already being redressed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Healthcare Reforms Doctors Association
State of Telangana
Telangana State Medical Council
Dr. Raj Siddarth
Dr. V. Rajalingam
Dr. G. Rama Krishna Reddy
P. MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
