The writ petition was dismissed for default in the absence of representation from the petitioner, indicating a lack of interest to pursue the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.33017 of 2013
ORDER :
No representation for the petitioner. On previous occasions also, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. This matter was called in the morning at 10:30AM and again at 12:30PM but there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to pursue the matter.
The miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand
closed. No order as to costs.
__________________ A.ABHISHEK REDDY, J
Date: 27.02.2023 scs
The Petitioner
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
