L. Malla Reddy v. B. Srinivas
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed contempt cases alleging violation of status quo orders. The Court observed that the alleged construction of a compound wall and park features predated the orders and involved minimal additions. The Court closed both contempt cases, directing the parties to resolve substantive disputes in pending writ petitions.
What did the court decide?
Both Contempt Cases Nos. 1642 & 1643 of 2021 closed. Respondent authorities directed not to make any construction on the subject land pending disposal of writ petitions.
What the court decided
[3167 J
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTHDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY
CONTEMPT GASE NO: 1642 & 1643 OF 2021
CoNTEMPT CASE NO: 1642 OF 2021
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the Respondents for wilfully violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 2310912020 passed in l.A. No.1 of 2020in W.P. No. 16103 of 2020.
Between:
D. Kalpana, Wo Venkateswar Reddy, Age. 35 years, Occ. House Hold, R/o H.No. 3-4-16/A, Ramanthapur, Uppal Mandal Ranga Reddy District, TS.
...PETIT!ONERYPETITION ER
AND
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent authorities willfully violated the Court's status quo orders by converting the subject land into a park.
Whether there cannot be a question as to who is in possession in a contempt case regarding property ownership disputes pending in writ petitions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Kalpana
- petitioner
L. Malla Reddy
- respondent
B. Srinivas
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1643/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court