In a writ petition challenging dismissal from service, the High Court held that the cause did not survive for adjudication based on statements by the petitioner's counsel. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l
[3167 l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OFFEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY,
WRIT PETITION NO: 24236 OF 2008
Between:
K. Srinivasa Reddy, S/o K. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 36 years, Constable 4-96, Amangal Post&(M) Mahabubnagar District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring theproceedings dt 30-04-2008 on the file of 3rd respondent in rejecting the Appeal of the petitioner by confirming the order of dismissal of petitioner at'fi-q-2O07 in proceedings No.EssttTHOt62bn/BSF/200712274-85 on the file of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary unjust vioative ofArticle14 of constitution of lndia and contrary to theprovisions ofBoarder Security Force Act and Rules made there under and consequently direct the respondentsto continue the petitioner in service bygranting all consequentialincidental attendant benefits by allowing this Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. L PRABHAKARREDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. AS VASUDEVAN
Counset for the Respondents: GENTRALGOVERNMENT COUNSEL (K ARVIND KUMAR)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the cause in the present writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Having regard to the same, this writpetition is dismissed as infructuous.
The miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand
closed. No order as to costs.
sD/. MoHD S't+tX,iHLfl+'SH //TRuE coPY/ -Le--.^- sEcrtoN oFFlcER /
TO. '1. One CC to Sri. L Prabhakar Reddy' nOY991tS,[OPUC]A i..^^^r^ rnDl la1 2. OneCC to S1i.'n S VisuOevan'Advocate[oPUCl 3. one ccto Sri. centrar Governme;i'cil;;br(KArvind Kumar) [OPUC] 4. Two CDCoPies
TJ GJP {}r-
t t
I tlIt I I I
i I I
{ {
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710212023
'ri':: liT4 7S
l',
rl 4 [Pn ?$t3
j" ..
:'
ORDER
WP.No.24236 of 2008
\ \
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WTHOUT COSTS. &"J W
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given the circumstances stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
K. Srinivasa Reddy
The Director General, Border Security Force CGO Complex, Lodhi New Delhi
The Commandant, Head Quarters 62BN Border Security Force Sagar Road Bikanner, Rajasthan
Assistant Commandant, lG BSF RAJFTR Hqrs Rajasthan Fronter BSF Mandore Road Jodhpur, Rajasthan
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
