Dismissed

Arigela Satyanarayana, v. Union of India

Telangana HC6 Dec 2023WP/32518/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 32518 of 2023 filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC by Arigela Satyanaruyana seeking to set aside tax recovery notices. The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner after a stay application was adjudicated, resulting in dismissal without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to assail the subsequent order. No order as to costs.

Arigela Satyanarayana, Vs Union of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^337e ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 32518 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Arigela Satyanaruyana, 1-9-30, Adarsha Nagar, I/etpally, Old Karimnagar Dist., Jagityal District - 505325.

¶10

.....PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Union of lndia, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

¶13

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 3, Aayakar Bhavan, Karimnagar.

¶14

The lncome Tax Officer, Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Center, New Delhi.

¶15

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward2, Aayakar Bhavan, Karimnagar.

¶16

The Tax Recovery Officer, Signature Towers, Kondapur, Hyderabad.

¶17

.....RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^High Court^maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned notice having DIN and Letter^No. ITBA/COM/F/1712023-2411054819679(1) in FORM No.l.T.C.P. 1^dated O2tO8l2O23 issued by the 5th Respondent in light of stay application^being pending before the 4th Respondent as being unlavvful, arbitrary, issued without jurisdiction, being in violation of principles of natural justice and set-aside the sa me

¶19

!.A.NO:1 OF o23

¶20

Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to further stay all proceedings in pursuance of the impugned notice having DIN and Letter No. lrBA/coMrFr17t2o23-24r1054819629(1) in FoRM No. r.T.c.p. 1 dated o2l oBl 2023 issued by the Sth Respondent incruding the proceedings in notice having DIN and Letter No.lrBA lcoMtF t17 t2o23-241 1os7 170034(1 ) dated 15l'lU2o23. DIN and Letter No.trBAtcotvttFtlTt2o23-24t10s7226411(1) dated o5l11l2o23 and DtN and Letter No. trBtucoM/Fl1tt2o23-24l1058024030(1) dated 17 111 12023 issued by the 5th Respondent.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.PRADYOTH

¶22

9gyl:.]forthe^{Respondent No.1 : SRt GADI PRAVEENKUMAR,} DEpUTy SOLICITOR GEN. OF INDIA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 : Ms. SUNDARI R.plSUpATl

¶24

The Court made the foltowing ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJT

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.32518 OF 2023

¶27

ORDER:/per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.SAM KOSHV

¶28

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it has been informed that the stay application flled by the petitioner stands decided uide order, dated 05.12.2O23. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with a Iiberty to assail the subsequent order passed by the authorig concerned.

¶29

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,

¶31

shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I p, sEcTloN drr,".*

¶33

¶34

One CC to Sri T.Pradyoth, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Gadi Piaveen^{Kumar, DeputySolicitor General of lndia} [OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms. Sundari R.Pisupati,^{Advocate (OPUC)} 4. Two CD Copies

SA GJP w,'

HIGH COURT

DATED:0611212023

ORDER

-{{6. srArF
q
J nnnr
.o
3 oBili'i tuit ,])
* r)

¶40

WP.No.32518 of 2023

¶41

DISMISSING THE W.P

¶42

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶43

Bts
9$[,#,

¶44

i I

Arigela Satyanarayana, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arigela Satyanarayana, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Naazia Khan

Sub K Impact Solutions Limited Vs Sub K Impact Solutions Limited

Telangana Girijan Cop-operative Corporation Limited Vs The State of Telangana

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd, Vs Mohamed Azam

K a Reddy, Hyderabad Vs B Rajaram Yadav, Gujarat and 1 Other

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs K.Anji Reddy