The Court rejected a Miscellaneous Appeal No. 78 of 2024 filed by the Insurance Company against an order enhancing compensation quantum, deeming the appeal devoid of merits following a prior confirmed appeal.
The appeal was rejected without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[337s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP.SAM KOSHY AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI.JSTICEN.TUKARAMJI
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCE LLAI.IEOUSAPPEALNO: 78 OF 2024
Appeal filed under Order .l 73 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Order- and decree dated.19 03.20 10 in MVOP.No6-'t?-12007 on the file of the Court of the Before Motor Accident claims Tribunal-cum-XXll Additionalchief Judge, city Criminal Courts, at Hyderabad.
Between:
...APPELLANTS/R2,R3
AND
RR2 & 3 are declared asmaiorsher guardianshipfromR 1 vide C O 06.12 2023 in MACMAMP.3078 & 3079ot 2017 (l A 1 & 2 of 2017)
...RESPONDENTS/peIrs-1to 3 & R-1 & R4
MACMAMP. NO: 1366 OF2011
Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed insupport of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto permit the petitioner No. 1 to with draw his entire shareamountof Rs. 9,2'l ,0001 with interest and theinterest over fixeddeposit amountof minorrespondents2 and 3 which is in thecredit of OP.No.632 oi 2007 on the file of the XXll Additional Chief Judge cum Before the /otorAccidentsClaims Tribunal City Criminal Court at Hyderabad
MACMAMP. NO: 3700 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that inthe circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the orderspassed in OP No 632 of2007 dt.19-3-2010 on the file of XXll Additional Chief J udge-Cum-Beforeti/otorAccidents Claims Tribunal,City Criminal Court, Hyderabad,pendingMACIUA.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. KOTASUBBARAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to3: Ms SEEMA YASMEEN, rep SRI C VIKRAM CHANDRA
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: SRIT MAHENDER RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJT
M.A.C.M.A. No.78 OF 2O24
ORDER:per Hon'ble Sri Jrrstr'ce P.SAM XOSHY)
Heard Sri Kota Subba Rao, leamed counsel for the appellant and Ms.Seema Yasmeen, learned counsel representing Sri C. Vikram Chandra, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3/claimalts. Perused the record.
\
t
),
\
Consequentiy, rniscellaneous applications pending, if atrv, shall stand closed.
Sd/- P.CH NAGABHUSH BA ASSISTANT REGI TRAR
Ii
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To
'1 . The Chairman, I\4otor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-XXll Additional Chief Judge-cum-Claims Tribunal, C:ty Civil Court, Hyderabad.(With Records if any)
lpr Y{
HIGH COURT DATED:0611212023
ORDER MACMA.No.78 of 2024
1t\ E S rA r€,
/ 1I
J
P, 1E N$\l ?ul
ir*
a) t ;.J
REJECTING THE MACMA WITHOUT COSTS
,.trf.b fta,,
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THESIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
MOTOR ACCIDENTCIVILMISCELLANEO US APPEA L NO: 78 OF 2024
Between:
...APPELLANTS/R2,R3
AND
RR2 & 3 aredeclaredas majors !er- 9y910;31snip -from ^RlvideC O (1 A.1 & 2 ot 2o17) bo iz-ioia in [/ACMAI\i1P3078d 3079 of '017
...RESPONDENTS/peIrs-1to 3 & R-1 & R-4
Appeal filedunder Order 173of MotorVehicles Act'against the Order and decreedated'19.03.2010in.t'ltvop.t'to.os2tzooTonthefileoftheCourtofthe BeforeMotorAccidentctaimsrriounal-cum.XxllAdditionalChiefJudge'City Criminal Courts,at Hyderabad'
ORDER :This appeal comrng on for hearingand upon perusing the groundsof appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and thematerialpapersin the case and upon hearing the arguments of SRl.KOTA SUBBARAO, Advocatefor the Appellants and I/s SEETVA YASMEEN, rep SRI C VIKRAIMCHANDRA, Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri T MAHENDER RAO,Advocatefor the Respondent No.5
This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. P NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISIRAR N/w
SECTION OFFICER
To
lpr
V,(
--a
IGH COURT JATED: 0611212023
DECREE
MACMA.No.78 of 2024
REJECTING THE MACMA
WITHOUT COSTS
ra.dtl V,_ tft{'v
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Mohamed Azam
Thameema Azmi
Shameema Azmi
Amrutha Sirigiri
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
P. Sam Koshy
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
