Dismissed

Telangana Girijan Cop-operative Corporation Limited v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Dec 2023WP/32657/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition (W.P. No. 32657 of 2023) filed by a Gratuity Trust representative seeking directions to transfer a share amount from one master policy to another. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Counsel for petitioner prayed for withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition; dismissal allowed.

Telangana Girijan Cop-operative… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^337e ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE P.SAM KOSHY

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶7

TPETITION NO:3 26s7 0F 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Telanqana Giriian co-ooerative corporation Limited, Emproyees_Group Gratuity Trust,. Represehted bv its vc ano r[ranag,;ig-Dii!"i"r,-v5oi6vi-sJ.tn:J,a;,"s1;. Somutu Naik, Aged 59-years, 1st Ftoor, DSS aiarin]ildsau riir,, Hva"iJilo. "'"

¶10

...PETITtONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1' The state of reranoana,.Rep by its principar Secretary, Tribar werfare Department, Secretaiat eLiuinb, n'voii,oro.-'"-"

¶13

The State of Andhra prqOg:h, Rep by its principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, secretariat Buirding, Netapaou, nmJravatni, Andiira p;de;h. -'"

¶14

The VC and Manaoing Director, A.p Girijana Co-operative Corporation Limited (GCCL), Visakha,-patnam, Andhra prrj".I

¶15

ff,q. Chairman, GCC Employees Group Gratuity Trust, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.,

¶16

The General Mariager (Admn), GCC Ltd, Visakhapatnam, Andhra pradesh.

¶17

The Audit Officer, GCC Ltd., Visakhapatnam, Andhra pradesh.

¶18

The General Manager (Finance), GCC Ltd, Visakhapatnam, Andhra pradesh.

¶19

The Divisional Manaoer, (pension and Group Schemes), LIC of lndia, Hyderabad.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS to decrare the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioner for transfer of share amount of Rs.22,31 ,so,31lt _

¶22

(Twenty-Two Crores Thirty-One Lakhs Fifty Thousand Three Hundred and Seventeen rupees only) from earlier Master Poticy No.62024 to New Master Policy No.504006265 obtained by TSGCC(Telangana State Girijan Co-operative Corporation) for the employees working in Telangana State Girijan Co-operative corporation is illegal arbitrary and constitutional and consequenfly the direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for transfer of share amount of Rs.22,31,50,3171 (Twenty-Two Crores Thirty-One Lakhs Fifty Thousand Three Hundred and Seventeen rupees only) from earlier Master^policy No.62024 to New Master Policy No.504006265 obtained by Telangana State Girijan Co-operative Corporation for the employees working in Telangana State.

¶23

lA NO: 1 oF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for transfer of share amount of Rs.22,31,50,31 7/- (Twenty-Two Crores Thirty-One Lakhs Fifty Thousand rhree Hundred and seventeen rupees only) from earlier Master policy No.62024 to New Master Policy No.504006265 obtained by TSGCC(Tetangana State Girijan Co-operative Corporation) for the employees working in Telangana State forthwith duly passing necessary orders on the letters dated 06.07.2019, 15.O7.2019,^'19.08.2019, 29.1O.2O't9, 09.O1 .2O2O and 25.06.2O21 respectivety.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner : SR! NAYAKAWAD] RAMESH

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.l : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 :

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{P.SAM KOSHY} AND THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE^N.TUI(ARAMJI

¶31

W.P.No.32657of 2o23

¶32

ORDER:^(per Hon'ble^{Sri JusticeP.SAMKOs,,lY)}

¶33

Sri N. Ramesh, learned^{counsel appearing for the} petitioner prays for withdrawal of the^{Writ Petition with a} liberty to file a fresh writ^petition.

¶34

Accordingly, this Writ Petition^{stands dismissed as} withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.^{There shall be no order} as to costs.

¶35

Consequently, miscellaneous^{applications pending,if}

¶36

any, shall stand closed.

¶37

SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSTSTANT BEGISfRAR //TRUE COPY// n4./ SECTION OFFICER

¶38

To, 1. One CC to SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH, Advocate. IOPUCI

¶39

Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶40

Two CD Copies. BSK BS

k\u-

.l I il

il , ,i l

HIGH COURT

DATED:0511212023

ORDER

WP.No.32657 ot 2023

E STAT€
1Y1
(
P
(',
i [4 iili ztl{
* ,;- C ;
;/

¶49

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶50

$,-}
2-b -

Telangana Girijan Cop-operative Corporation Limited v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Telangana Girijan Cop-operative Corporation Limited v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Colors Out door advertising Vs The Assistant commissioner of Central Tax

Kallam Subba Rao Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax (Tds), And Another

Mr. Sathyanarayana Pandula Vs The Income Tax Officer

The National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Naazia Khan

Sub K Impact Solutions Limited Vs Sub K Impact Solutions Limited

Atika Sathyamma Vs The State of Telangana