Allowed

C Ravinder Reddy v. Prl.Secretary ( Irrigation) and 4 Others

Telangana HC12 Sept 2023WP/3128/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court allowed a Writ Petition filed by a displaced person seeking employment under a resettlement scheme. The Court set aside the respondents' rejection order dated 15.11.2016, which claimed the petitioner filed his application late. The Court found the petitioner had submitted his application within the stipulated one-year period and directed the authorities to consider his case within

What did the court decide?

Set aside the impugned rejection order; direct respondents to reconsider petitioner's claim for employment under displaced persons quota within three months.

C Ravinder Reddy Vs Prl.Secretary (… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

! i I I { I I I i I r It I I I I

¶2

[³³⁰³ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY^{OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY THREE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{J. SREENIVAS RAO}

¶7

WRIT PE TITION NO:^{3128 OF 2017}

¶8

Between:

¶9

C.Ravinder Reddy, S/o C.Linga^{Reddy,Aged 39 years, Occ Unemployee,R/o} Erladinne village,^{-Narva [\ilandal, I,4ahabubnagarDistrict.}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by rts PrincipalSecretary' lrrigation andCAD} oepaiment (PW: LAI IV-RR)^{Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad'}

¶13

2 The District collector /^{chairmanof Selection, committee,l/lahabubnagar} District at lr,4ahabubnagar.

¶14

3 The Joint Collector/ I/ember^{of Selection, Committee, Mahabub Nagar District} at IVahabub Nagar.

¶15

4 The Chief Engineer/Member^{-Convener of,Selection Committee,} Priyadarshini JuraTa Project,^CircleNo.'l ,^{Gadwal,[\IahabubnagarDistirtct'}

¶16

A The Superintending Engineer,^{PriyadarshiniJurala Project,Circle No l,} Gadwal, Mahabubnagar^Distirtct.

¶17

6 The District Collector, Wanaparthy,^{Wanaparthy District.}

¶18

7 The Joint Collector, Wanaparthy,^{WanaparthyDistrict.}

¶19

8 The Chief Engineer, lrrigation^{Clrcle, Pebbair,Wanaparthy District.}

¶20

I The Superintending Engineer,^{lrrigation Circle, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District'} (RR 6 to 9 are impleaded as^per C.O dt.^{1010712023in lA O1l2O22l}

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution^{of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith, the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more^{particularly one in the natureof} writ of [/andamus, declaring the action of^{respondents2 to 5 in not appointingthe} petitioner in any suitable post under displaced^{persons quotain termsof}

¶23

¶24

G.O.lt/s.No-98,^{lrrigation and CAD (ProjectsWing -SRSP'l) Department'} dt.15.04.1986^{and proceedingsissued by 5th respondent in speaking order} No.SE/PJP/AB^{lECZI1go3'd1 15 11 2016 as illegal' arbitraryand contraryto} G.o.tVs.98,^{lrrigation and CAD(Projects Wing- SRSPl) Department' ,15.04.1986} and also^{violative of Articles14 anrl 21 of Constitutionof lndia and consequently} direct the^{respondents to appointthe petrtioner in any suitable post and extendthe} i seniority^{and other benetitson par with similarly situated personsand also to pay} costs

¶25

t.A. NO :1OF2⁰¹⁷

¶26

PMP^{NO:37030F2 017)}

¶27

petition under section 151^{cpc praying that in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition'the High Court may be pleasedto direct} the respondents^{2 to 5lo reconsiderthe case of the petitioner for employment} under^{displaced persons quota without referenceto speaking order No SE} 1lP JPIABIEC-l/1903,^{d| 15 11 2016 issued by the 5th respondent' pending} disposal^{of writ} Petition^'

¶28

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI C SAI REDDY}

¶29

Counsel^{for the Respondents:GP FOR SERVICES-II}

¶30

The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

¶31

*ti

¶32

¶33

rION'BLE SRI JUSTICI' J. SREENI/AS RAO

¶34

WRIT PETITION No.3128 OF 2Ol7

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

This s.,rit pctition is filed Ibr Lh<' foliorving re lief:

¶37

" .. to issLLc .r Wrir, orclcr or direc-tion morc partrcularly onc in thc natur-e of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 Lo 5 ur nol :tl)r)ointing the peLitioner in any sui(able posl uuder drsniac.cl persons quota in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, lrrigation & CAI) (Irrolecrs Wing :SRSP.l) Dcpartn)ent, dt.15.O4.1986 ;rnd proc.r:rlrngs rssr,recl by 5rl, r'espondent in speaking ordcr No. SE/P.,P/AB/EC2/1903, dt. 15.11.2O16 as illegal, arbitrary ar-rd corltr(u] to G.O.Ms.gB, [rrigalion & CAD (Projects Wing: SIiSI' I) IJcirirrLrncnt, 15.O4. 1986 and also r.iolative of Articles 14 and 2 I of Constitutjon of lndia and consc(lucnUy direct thc rcspondents to .11)Jrorrrt Lhc pcLirioncr in any slritablc post and cxtcn(l the scniority al(l a)tilcr bcrtcfits on p:rr rvilh sinrilarly situated pcrsons anri also t() l)a1,\ ar()sl s..."

¶38

2. The brief facts of the casc are that:

¶39

2-.1 'll-ie petitioner is o\.ncr and posscssor of Flousc healing No.3 8'7/J .-rnci also lar-rd io an oxtcnt of Ac.O.05 gts. in S.v.No.4.i/2, sitlraLecl :rt ltrladinne Villagc ancl the sarne was acquircd by ti:c (lovernmelr by initiating the Land Acquisition Proceedings thror,Lgh Au,ard Nos.4 of 1993 and rl5 ol 1999, dated 23.O1,.1993 ar,l 29.O5.1999 rcspcctivcly.^'lhe Specia Dcputy Collector hacl issucd cr: r t.i fi c-:zrtc uide l(:LLer No.B / 62 / 94 daLed 2l .O7 .1999 certifying l ha t '.he propcrtics of [hc l)el itioner \/ere acqtrired for tl-tc purposc of submcrgoncc of l)riyadarsh ini Jurrala Proje ct.^'lhe petitioner has mircle :rn allplication to respondent No.2 oo, 22.1 I .1999 sccl(inir, employmcnt Lrndcr rlisplaced persors/land looser persons qrrota, pursuanl t() thc (i.C).Ms.No.98 lrrigation ancl CIAD (Projccts Wir-rg:SRSI'",1] *l)eparinrent daLcd 15.04.I986 ars; he is; travir-rg

¶40

isR,^j i".l'N0 llTtJ oll017

¶41

¶42

¶43

reqlrlsite qLr:rlilication, Lhe same^{s'as [onva-r'cledto responclentNo 5.} I r-r the lirsL r'r.r: ek of Jul-r. 2OOO,^{rcspotlclet'rL No.5 ir-rformed tl-rat the} application submittecl b-r-the^{pe[I1ioller could r.rot bc tracedout and} due to rvi-rich he submitted ar-rother^{applicatior-ron O3.O7.2OOO} bclore rcspondenl No.2.

¶44

2.2. 'lhe petitioncr hr,rcl filcd anothcr application belore respondent No.2 on I8.O6.2O0'+ requcstirlg^hin-r to consrdcr^his clairn for providing employrnent under thc^{displaced pcrsons quota} and also enciosed X ciass certilicatc,^{s'l'ric:hu':rs} acquired^{in March} 2OO4. Further, hc submitLed anotl-rcr represct-rt:rtion^{ot-t O6.1O.2006} to rcspondent No.2. When thc I-cspondents failed to^{considert1-re} above said representation s, he had approached Andl-rra Pradesh Adrninistrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short, the APAT) and filed O.A.No.34 1 o{ 2OO7 and the same was disposed of on 29.O1.2OO7 directing the respondents therein to consider the representation dated 18.O6.2004 submittcd by the petitioner and^pass appropriate orders. On 09.O2.2OO7, pctitioner approerched respondent^No.2 and submitted repre sentation b5, enclosing copy of the order^dated 29.OL.2OO7 passed in O.A.No.34 I of 2OO7. When the rcspondents failed to implement the said order, petitioner liled Contempt Case No.764 of 2OO7. During the per-rdencl' of the said conternpt case ,

¶45

'-----'.:=a r:- .7 't:.t'-: ,

¶46

lsR.l h/.I'.No.3128 oi l0I7

¶47

¶48

¶49

rcsponcle nt No.5 issuecl speaking order on 07.12.2OOZ and 26.12.2OO7 stating that the Land Acquisition Officer have passed An,ards clated 23.O 1 . 1993 and 29.O5_ 1999, hor.r.ever, petitioner failed to submit his application lor sceking employment under the scheme s'ithin stipulated timc of one ycar, as such, his case could not bc considered for appointrncnt. Questioning the above said orclcr, pctitioncr iilccl O.A.No. L725 ol 2008 before APAT. The APAT rvhile set [ing asicle ttre ordcr clated 07. 12.2OO7 directed thc

¶50

rcspondenl s lhere in to reconsidcr the case of the petitioner in terms ol' G.O.Ms-No.98 bv its order dated 24.O8.2O11. Respondent No.5 u,,ithoul considcring [he sarne issued speaking order ulde Letter No.Str /PJP/AB/trC-2/3707 dated 18.03.2011 rejecting the claim of the petitioner reiterating the very same objections that the petitioncr has not submlttcd application q,ithin one year from the date of passing of the Award.

¶51

2.3. Thereafter, petitionersubrnitted anotherrepresentation on 02.12.2O72 and when the respondents failed to.consider the same, once again he approached APAT and filed O.A.No.I67 I ct[ 2016 and the same was disposed of on 15.06.2016 directing the respondcnts to consider the representation dated t6.T1.2015 pertainirr[a t.o petit.iorter claiming for- appointmel]L to t]rc post ol

¶52

.t+tatt' t '. - "nl$il}l \ -.^{. rr*d,}

¶53

":l 1.r1i! I

¶54

ls^il' i \'.P.\o.31211 ni 2017

¶55

¶56

¶57

Office Subordir-ratc or any oLller suirable post in tcrms of - G.O.Ms.No.98 dt: 15.04.1986, arld pass apltropria{e orders in accordance u'1th thc ruics and the lat- govcrning thc subjcct, subject to eligibility, rvilhir-r 3 rnor-rth s from r_latc of reccipt of cop-r. of thc order. Pursuant to the said ordcr, pclitioner submittcd repre sen tatior-r to respondent No.5 o11 29.O9.2O16 and to re:;pondcnt No.2 on Ol.iO.2O16, requt:sting thcm to consider his case for employment as per his qutrlification undcr displaced pc:rsons qtiota as per G.O.Ms.No.98 datecl 15.O4.1986. t?espondent No.5 issucd. impr-rgned spcaking ordcr No.SFl /p.JlP/AB/EC2/1903 dated 15.I1.2016 rejectir-rg the clzrin-r ol tl-rc peLitioner on the .ery same ground that he has not submitted thc application u.ithin one year of the displaccment pursllant Lo the Awards dated 23.O7.1993, 29.O5.1999 and 30.06.2006. Questioning the above said order, the present writ pctilion is filed.

¶58

Heard Sri C.Sai Recldy, lcan-red counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government f)1eaclet- fbr Services-II, appearing on behalf of thc respondents.

¶59

Learned counsel for thc petitioner contenclcd that the petitioner's propcrtics u,ere acquircd by the respondent (iovernment

¶60

ISR, J \1r.P.Nu.312U ot 2017

¶61

Try

¶62

¶63

for public purpose invoking thc plovisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, through Au.errds datcd 23.O1.1993, 29.O5.1999 and 30.06.2006 respeclivel-'. Thc Government had issued (i.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986 providing employment to the displaccd pcrsons or thcir dcpcndarts under re habilitation scl-Lcrnc.^'lhc conccrnccl rcvr-'nuc authorities have also issued ccrtificatc on 21.O7 .1999 uide I-cttcr No.13/62 /94 ccrtifyrng that the land and house propertics ol the petitioner were acquired by the Ciovernment for public purpose. Pursuant to the scheme, petitioner slrbmitted application to respondent No.2 on 22.1L1999 reqlresting thern to provide ernploymclrt unde r displaced persons quota. When the respondents failed to considcr the same, petitioner approached APA'I and liled O.A.No.341 of 2OO7 and the samc was disposed of on 29.O 1.2OO7 directing thc rcspondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 1 8. 06 .2OO4 arLd pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The respondent authorities, withoul propcrll' considering the application submitted by the petitioner, issr.red order on 07.72-2OO7 artd 26.12.2007 on the alleged ground that the petitioner has not submitted the application within thc stipulated time of one year from Lhe date of au,ard, though the petitior-rer subrnittcd application within the

¶64

T51l I ,!'" P \l] I L2B oil01l

st rpulatccl time

4.1. Hc further contenteci^{thatqucstior-iirlg saicl rcjection} ordcr,pctitionerfrlcdO.A.No.l725of2008:rndthci['A'l'u'hilc se tti11g arside tl-re order^{dated07 .12.2oO7} ,^{directcd Ll-rc rcspondents} to recor-rsider the case^{o[ the pctitioneril-r tern-rs of G O Ms No 98 by} iLs ordcr clatcd 24.O8.2011.^{Further, petitioncr stlbmitrcd another} l'cprcsclrtation on 02.12.2O12^{andt.l'rc resporldcrltsfailedto} considcr thc same. Pctitioner^{once again approached APAT and} filcd o.A_No. 167 7 of^2O 16^{and the same $,as disposeclof clirccting} tl.re rcsponcients to considcr^{thc reprcscltt.ltion cl:t1ec11tr.11.2015} pertaining to petitioner's claim^{for appoilltmcntto the post of Office} Subordinatc or arry other^{suitabLe post it-r tcrms olG O Ms-No 98} clt:15.04.1986, and^{pass appropriate orders in accordance with the} rules and the lau.^governing the^{subject,subject to eligibrlity within} three(3) months frorr date^{of receipt of copy of the order by its order} dated 15.06.2O16.

¶69

4.2. Learned counsel vehementll'^{contende d thatthe} respondents withotrt properly^{verifying the docurr-rct-lts andalso} scherne introduced by the Governrnent under^{(l.O.Ms-No.98dated} I 5.O4. 1986 passed the impugncd^{order rr-rechanicallywithout}

¶70

ISR, J \V I No.3I28 oi 2017

¶71

4 ;:

¶72

¶73

applying the mind, reiterating the very same ground that the pctitioner has noL submittc(l appiicertion rvithin one year from thc date of displacerncnL pursllant to thc Au.ards dated 23.O 1 1993 and 29.O5.1999, though thc pctitioner had sr-rbmitted appiication within thc time.

¶74

4 .3. He further contended t hat thc respondents themselves have enclosed cop1, of the application submitted by thc petitioner datcd 22. I 1 . 1 999 as material paper along with counter-affidavit Hence, thc rejection orcler perssecl by respondent No.5 holding that thc petitioner has not submittcd the application within sLipulated time is contrary to the records. I-le furthcr contended that subclause (iii) of clause 4 of G.O.Ms.No.98 specifically says application for appointment frorn thc e ligible candidate shall be rnade to the District Collector concerned within a period of one year from the date of actual displacement of thc family. The respondents have acquired the properties of the petitioner through Awards dated 23.O1.1993, 29.O5.1999 and 3O.O6.2OO6 respectively, for public purpose ald actual displacernent was taken subsequen[ly. The

¶75

pe titioner had submitted application seeking employment under scherne within the stipulzrtcd time of one year. Respor-rdent No.5 even without verifl,ing the records, passed the impugncd order

I:^11l ', 1' :.;r, .l I 2ll ol .'^I I

¶80

mech:tirica1l-r^{a r-rcl rhc same is contr:1ry to I:1u'}

¶81

Per contra, learr-red^{Governmer-rLPleadcrstLbmitsth:rt} respondcnl No.5 after^{cor-rsidering lhe re prcsentationsltl>mitteclbY} llrc petitioncr and^{alsozrfterdue Vcrificertion of thc records,riglltlr'} passccl thc impr-tgncd rejection^{order dated 15'1 1 2O 16 llc furtl'rcr} subn-rits ti.ra t as^per the^{scheme, thepetitionerhas tosubluiL} zrpltircatior.r^\,il_l-rir-r the slipulated^{time of one ycar from [hc actual} datc of- clisplercemcnt.^{BuL, the pctitioncrhas not subnlittedthe} altplication^{u.ithir-r one yeal. from Lhe date of displacerncnt and he is} lo1 crntirlecl anv relief,^{ml.chless thcrelicf solrghtirlLhe s'rit} pctil ion.

¶82

Ilaving considered the rival^{subrnissionsrnade by the} rcspective parties and upon^{perusal of thc rnaterialavailablcon} record, it clearly r-cveals that^{the properties of the petiLioner lverc} acquirecl b1, the^{respondent Government for public purposc i'e , for} Pril,adarshini Jurala Projcct,^{by initiating the proccedingsunder} the Act and passed^{Awards Dt:23 Ol'1993, 29'O51999 and} 30-06.2006 respcctively^{and Special ,Deputy Collcctorhad issued} certificaLe vidc letter No^.B / 62 / 9a^{dated2 I .O7 .1999certifying thal} thc propcrtics ol thc petitioner s'ere acquired^{for public purposc'}

¶83

':r.i r-'r:-1'3l .: '.' ''. : ,,,

¶84

I5R ] W.l,.No.:1128 of20l7

¶85

¶86

¶87

'I'he Govcrnrner-rt had issucd G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.I986 provicling emplo-ymcnL to thc dispiacccl persor-rs or thcir dependanr-s under re habilitation scheme. Pursuant to the schcrne, petltloner submitted application to respondent No.2 requesting them to provide cmployment under displaced persor-rs quota. When thc rcspondents failed to considcr the said application, petitioner had approached APAT and filed O.A.No.341 of 2OO7 and the sarne was drsposed of on 29.O1.2OO7 direcLing thc respondents therein to consid<:r Lhc represcntation daced 18.06.2OO4 and pass appropriate ordcrs. On 07.12.2OO7 respondent No.5 passecl speaking order rejecting the representation on the ground thc petitioner had no[ made application within a pcriod of onc year. Questioning the same , petitioner has filed O.A.Nos.1725 of 2OO8 ar-rcl the sarne was disposed of on 24.O8.2O 1 1 by setting aside the rejection order dated 07.12.2OO7 and directed the respondents to rc-consider the claim oF^(he petitioner pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.98 date d 15.04.1986 and pass appropriate orders within a period of lour weeks from [he date of rcceipt of copy of the order b1, its order dated 24.08.2011. Thereafter, petitioner submittecl another representation on 02.12.2O12 and when the respondents failed to consider tlte same, petitioner once again approached APAT and filed O.A.No.167 1 ol

\re !t -11

I i li liiti ttli1i

lsR,l \'.P.No.:l I^;'ri :rr l1)17

¶94

'2O l6 arrcl thc sarrle \':rs clisposcd of directing t l-r <: rcspondcnLs Lo considcr ti-rc r-cprcscntation datecl^I 6. 1¹ .20 15 pertaining Lo ltctitioner's^{clairn for appointmentto the post of Office Subordrnate} or an\ othcr suiLrr.ble^posL in tcrms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dL: 15.O4.1986 and p.1ss appropriate orrlers in accordancc^u,i tl-r the rules ancl the Iarv goverrrir-rg tirc subject, subject to eligibility within three months fro n-r cia1.r: of^r-i:ceipt of cop1, of the order b1, iLs order cllted 15.O6.20l6 l)Lrrsllan[ 1o the samc, rcsponder-rt No.5 issr:cd in-r pugnccl speakir-rg order holding that the petitioner- l-rad not sr-Lbmittcd apphcation vvithir-r onc year from thc date ol displacenrent purslrzrnt to the Ar,r,ards dated 23.O t . 1993, 29.O5.1991) and 30.06.2006. It reveals from the entirc recorcl tl'rat this is thc fot-rth rotrnd of litigation.

¶95

It furthcr rcveals from the record that the petitioner had subrnitlcd application to respondent No.2 on 22.17.1999 sccking cmployment as per G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986. The said applicatror-r^{w,as enclosed} as trxhibit.P.4 at Page No.84 alor-rg rn'ith colrnter affidavit liled b1' respondent No.5 in thrs writ pctition ar-rd the said clocumcnt clearl5, shou.s, therc is signature and seal of the cor-rcerncd oflicers of respondent No.2 acknowledging the samc. I{errcc, the impugned rejection order dated 75.11.2O16 parsscd b1,

¶96

¶97

ISR,I ','l,\o 3128 oi201l

I .!I I I ll I i I

il tl i I

rcsponclcr-rt No.5 is contrary to thc material available on records

¶102

¶103

[t is vcr.y much relcvalnt to mcntion herc t hat thc petitioncr propertics i.e., housc as rvell as land u.cre acquired lor the public purpose by initiating proceedings under the Act and passed Arvards clated 23.01. 1993, 29.O5. 1999 and 30.06.2006 rcspectivcly, and the petitioncr q,as displaced from the propcrties co'cred under the said Ar,,,ards and hc comes within Lhe meaning of "clisplaced person/family" and as pcr the G.O.Ms.No.9g dated 1 5.0.1 . 1986, issucd by the Gover.nment, petitioner is eligible to claim crlpioyrnent under land losers/ displacement quota. It is relevant to extract sub-clause (iii) of clause 4 of the G.O.Ms.No.9g datcd 15.O4.I986, which reads as under:

¶104

'Application for appointrnent from ttre eligible candidates shall be rnade to the District Collector concerned uzithin a period of one year lrom the datc of actual displacernent ot tlie famity. prefercnce shall be given with reference to the date of displacement and to those applicants whose houses and lands are acquired against those whose land or house only is acquired. The District Collectors shall draw up a list of such applications and forward the sarne to thc project authorities for appointrnent."

¶105

It rs already stated supra, as per Lhe pleadings and also material documents liled b-y thc respective parties, it clearl_1, proves that petitione r had slrbmitted application on 22 .I 1 . 1999 before

':a

JSiI,^J tI l'.\o i1Ztl ol20ll

¶111

rcsponder.lt No.2 for- sceJiing ernpJol.ment as pcr the above sard G.O.Ms.No.98 daterl 15.0.1.1986 and thc sard application is u.ithin the strpulatccl timc of onc vcar as per the Award dated 29.05.1999. Subscqucntfl'. pe tltioncr h:rd submitted another appiica(ior-r Lo the respondcnts o1r 06.1O.2006 pursuant lo the Au,ard datcd 30.06.2006 ancl rhe said application is also within one year. As on thc datc of initial submission of the application dzrtcd 22.11.1999, the petitior.rr:r is l-raving \ill class qualification and subsequct-rtly i'rc acquirecl X cla ss.

¶112

Tl-rr: r-easons assigned in support of the itr-rpugr-red rcjectior-r oldcr datcd 15.11.2O16 passed by respondent No.5 is contrary to thc matcrial cvidencc on record and the same is liablc to be set asidc, ernd accordrngly sct aside and the respondents arc dirccted to cor-rsider the claim of the petitioner for providing employmcnt undcr Lhe displacement ql.tota in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dt:15.04.1986, by duly taking into consideration of the appiication submitted by the petitioner dated 22.1 1. 1999 and subsequent applications dzrtcd 18.O6.2004 and 06.10-2006 tor appointmer-rt to thc post of Office Subordinate or any other suitable post, basing upon his qualification, within a period of three (3) months from date of rcceipt of copy of the order.

¶113

J5R, ] ,V I' \0.-l12U oi lLlL'

i 1)

11 \rit h tht: above directiolt, the \.rit petition is allou'cd. No

¶118

COSlS

¶119

t2 ILr vicr.r, of the disposai of the main rvrit pctition,^llu furthc-r ordcrs need to be passed in^{W.P.M.P.No.37O3} of^2OO'/ Accorclrngh, the said application is also closed,

¶120

s D/- M o H ? s.t+A'lt'#tfl I'ST //TRUE COPY/I (# SECTION OFFICER

¶121

To,

¶122

The Principal^{Secretary, lrriqationand CAD Deparment (PW: LA' IV-RR)} ' o""priiiilils."r"iiiiri a,ildings, Hvderabad' state of rela nga^na

¶123

The District^{Collector / Chairman of Selection' Committee'Mahabubnagar} District at N/ahabubnagar.

¶124

The Joint^{Collector/tVlember of Selection, Committee' Mahabub NagarDistrict} at Mahabub^Nagar.

¶125

The Chief^{Engineer/Member-Convenerof' Selection.Committee' Priyadarshini}

¶126

jr;;'i;;;J";f Cit"l" No.1, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Distirtct'

¶127

The Superintending^{E19in991,PriyadarshiniJurala Project'CircleNo'1'} Gadwal, Mahabubnagar^Distirtct'

¶128

The District^{Collector, Wanaparthy,WanapartiryDistrict'}

¶129

The Joint^{Collector,Wanaparthy, Wanaparthy District'}

¶130

The Chief^{Engineer, lrrigation Clrcle, Pebbair' WanaparthyDistrict'}

¶131

The Superintending^{Engineer, lrrigation Circle' Pebbair'WanaparthyDistrict'}

¶132

One CC to^{SRI C.SAIREDDY,Advocate[OPUC]}

¶133

1^,l . Two CCs to^{GP FoR SERVICES-II,HighCourt for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶134

12.fwo CD^CoPies

BSR

GJP

, i

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1210912023

ORDER

WP.No.3128 of 2017

€I ATE OF
i-i ii
ct 5qt s t, :l
C) t1
'..i
rtr nr- c i,.

¶144

ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION,

¶145

WITHOUT COSTS

¶146

\ 5
a w)

C Ravinder Reddy v. Prl.Secretary ( Irrigation) and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C Ravinder Reddy v. Prl.Secretary ( Irrigation) and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Mallesham, Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

K. Janju Naik Vs The State of Telangana

V R M Reddy, Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

T.Rajender Rao, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary

D. Pochaiah, Vs State of Telangana

Dr. B.Ramana Prakash, Vs The State of Telangana