Writ petition under Article 226 filed for service benefits was dismissed as abated because the sole petitioner died during pendency and legal heirs failed to file a representation application within the granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 32372 OF 2017
Between:
K.Janju Naik, S/o. Ghan Singh, Age 55 years, Occ Head Constable (APSP) (HC654), F/o.#15-4711, Sai Nagar (Phase-ll), Balapur X Roads, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER/S
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order, orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari - l) calling for the records ofproceedings in Memo.No.26338/Ser.ll/A3/201 1, dt.2O-04-2O12 of the 1't respondent andquash it duly declaring as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative,perverse, opposed to the principles of natural justice besides violative of Arts.14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and ii)consequently, set aside the same and also direct the 1't respondent to accord all incidental and consequential service and monitorybenefits to the petitioner
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO:40269 OF2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto fix an early date for adjudicating and hearingof the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PEETA RAMAN
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:ORDER
HON'ELE SRT JUSTICE J. SREE:YTVA,S R,C,O I/rit Petition No. 32372 of.2OL7
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consid:ration on 30.08.2023, learned counsel for the petitionerjn orrned the Court that luring the pendency of the Writ Pe,titron, the sole petitioner died and requested two we,:ks time for filing necessary rpplication to bring the Legal Re6rr<:se ntatives on to record
Pendirrg miscellaneous petitions,, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. C. PIIA/EEN KUMAR ,\SSIS Tr\Nt' REGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY// :;ECTIO FFICER
To :;ECTIO 1. One CC to Sri peeta Raman, Advocate tOpUCl 2. Two CCs to Gp fo. H ome, High Court for the Siate c,f Telargan:r at Hyderabad IOU'l 3. Two CD Coiies' Kj GJP \ v
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/09/2023
.<br>4:i .r1 9TAIg 4 )t
,)
1$ 6I?uD :,i I
.-,.::/
'ar)
.,/
{.:i. .7
ORDER
WP.No.32372 of 2O17
DISMISSING THE WP A:i I\BATED WITHOUT COSTS.
@&*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Janju Naik
State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
