, a Writ Petition No. 28931 of 2022 was filed seeking a Mandamus for permission to sell Ganesh Idols pending since the Corona period. The Court held that due to the efflux of time, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, the Court dismissed the popular writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3377 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARAOHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WR]T PETITION NO: 28931 0F 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation dt.18-O6-2O22 pertaining to permission to Sale Ganesh ldol which were made ready earlier Corona period and consequenfly declare the inaction of
I I II
the respondents 1 to 5 in disposing off the representation dt.18-06.-2022, in lhe lnterest of Justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent 1 to 5 to consider and dispose off the representation d1.18-O6-2022 of the petitioner, Pending Disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. B.SAPNA REDDY
Gounsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 3 & 5: SRI HARENDER PRASAD, REP. FOR ADVOCATE GENERAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA The Court made the following: OROER
I I I I I l I I I i I I i ! I :
THE HON'BLE TTIE CHIEE. JUSTICE AI.OK ARADIIE AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN I{I'MAR
WRIT PETITION No.28931 of2022
ORDER: eer the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Atok Arcldhe)
IVIs. B. Sapna Reddy, learned counsel for the petrhoners.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shalt
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTIO OFFICER
1 One CC to M/s. B.SAPNA REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI 2 9ne QQro SRt V.NARASTMHAGOUD, SC FOR HM6R ropucr 3 f.woccs to ADVOCATE GENERAL, riign court ror tne btate 6i tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies BSR GJP
er\q.
HIGH COURT
DATED: OBl09l2O2g
ORDER
WP.No.28931 of 2022
I 1EL
q
o
Ar 7*
,4 .r,"
lrJ o
F UJ
do Nl.- o
<br>I o
t
o
H
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT GOSTS
-z*lrs'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the efflux of time since the representation was made.
9m Prakash
Dinesh Singh
Vikram Singh
The State of Telangana
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
Alok Araohe
N.V. Shrvan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
