Writ Appeal No.880 of 2023 was dismissed vide a separate judgment. Interlocutory applications were disposed of based on reasons assigned or the main judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD
MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.880 OF 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
| S. No. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01. | 08.09.2023 | CJ & NVSK, J | |
| I.A.No.1 of 2023 | |||
| Mr. S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants. Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2023. For the reasons assigned in the application, requirement of filing the certified copy of the order dated 09.06.2013 passed in W.P.No.14001 of 2013 is dispensed with. In the result, the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed. |
Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any. |
||
| ____________ CJ (AAJ) |
|||
| ____________ NVSK, J I.A.No.2 of 2023 |
|||
| Mr. S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants. |
|||
| In view of the judgment passed today in |
| W.A.No.880 of 2023, no furt |
her order is |
|---|---|
| required in the impleadment peti I.A. is disposed of accordin |
tion. gly. |
| ____________ CJ (AAJ) |
|
| ____________ NVSK, J |
|
| WRIT APPEAL No.880 of | 2023 |
| Writ Appeal is dismissed. (Vide Separate Judgment) |
|
| (B/o.) KL |
CJ (AAJ)
NVSK, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
