Dismissed

Social Justice Party of India v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Nov 2023WP/28752/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC challenging administrative inaction and an illegal appointment was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court of Telangana as withdrawn by the petitioner, with liberty to avail statutory remedies.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies as available under law. No costs.

Social Justice Party of India Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO:28752 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Social Justice Party of lndia, rep. by its President, Chamakura Rajaiah @ C.Raju Sio. Shankaraiah, Aged about 45 Years, Rl/o. H-No.2-96, Chinna Ravirala, Abdullapur Met (M), Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

...'ET,T'ONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Consumer Affairs Food and Civil Supplies CS I CCS Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.500022.

¶13

The Controller of Legal Metrology, Government of Telangana, 209, PWD Building, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State.500080.

¶14

The Assistant Controller, (Admin), Legal Mekology, 209, PWD Building, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State 500080.

¶15

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶16

Director of Accountant General, Office of the Account General, Kairathabad Telangana State, Hyderabad-500004

¶17

Smt. A.Venkata Ramana, Wio. C.N/ahendra D/o. Late A.Srinviasa Murthy, Aged about 50 Years, Working as Superintendent O/o.The Controller of Legal Metrology, 209, PWD Building, GandhinaQar, Hyderabad, Telangana State.5000B0.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the in-action of the 1st to 3'd Respondents in not taking any action on the petitioners complaint dated 17-08-2023 and 05-09-2023 and also as per the recommendation of 2nd respondent to 1st respondent vide D.O.Lr.No.80831E112006, dated 14-11-2006 against the illegal appointment of 6th Respondent vide No.B008/E2l1999, dated 30-10-1999 is contrary to G.O.Ms.No.350, dated 30-07-1999 and G.O.Ms.No.400, dated 12-09-1996 and

¶20

¶21

inconsequence thereof to direct the Respondents^{1 to 5 to take action against 6th} Respondent for removal from service and^{recover salaries paid to her so far.}

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to direct} the Respondents 1 to 5 to inquire into the^{6th respondent appointment and} dispose off the representation of the Petitioner's^{dated17 -08-2023and 05-09-} 2023 by dismissing the 6th respondent from service^{and to recoverthe salary paid} to 6th respondent,^pending disposal of the above^{writ petition.}

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PONNAM^RAVINDAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3:^{GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES} Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: GP^FORGAD

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE.T. SREENIVAS RAO

¶27

WRIT PETITION No.28752 of 2o23

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

¶30

of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail remedies as available under law.

¶31

In view of the above submission, the writ petition is

¶32

dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner as sought for. No costs.

¶33

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

stand closed.

//TRUE^COPY//

,,,- "i",t,u+fs,:HH3i$H"ofl / qlD

¶38

SECTIdN^OFFICER

¶39

¶40

1 2 ?*s33Jif5i?"J$3,V,$Y,'$"$Eslflt"f3sJ3tY?tlestateot t8'Utcou rt tor tne State or rerangana' at

¶41

3 +*:fE:ti t Sttff^Bfr, ' uvderabad. [OUTI

¶42

1. Triro CD^CoPies

¶43

PSK. GJP w

HIGH COURT

DATED:0211112023

ORDER

WP.No.28752 ot 2023

I $e sTAre
J
o
2 1 N[\l ?023
t
* DEs Pr'5

¶51

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶52

s^*da Pf-

¶53

G('(*

Social Justice Party of India v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Social Justice Party of India v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Jubilee Hills Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., Vs S. Padma Reddy (M.S.No.4792)

Smt.a.Ramadevi Vs The State of Telangana

Jp Agarwalla Family Trust Vs The State of Telangana

K. Chandraiah, Vs Mr. Rajatha Kumar, I.A.S.

Bachu Laxman Vs Sri Sri C.v.Anand I.P.S.

P.Venugopal Goud and 2 Others Vs The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and 3 Others