Dismissed

Smt.a.Ramadevi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Nov 2023WP/27604/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and a connected petition under Section 151 CPC seeking release of funds held in a bank account. The petition was withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies as available under law, and the petitions were dismissed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to avail remedies as available under law.

Smt.a.Ramadevi Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3303 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS^RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 27604 OF 2023

¶7

Eetween:

¶8

Smt.A-Ramadevi, D/o. Late D.Subba^{Rao, Agedabout32 years, Occ. Managing} Partner of l\rlls.Sri Vinayaka Engineering^{Works, R/o. D.No.10-90, VinayakaNagar,} Balanagar, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{Principal Secretary,Cooperative} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Government^{of Telangana,Hyderabad.}

¶13

3 Kranthi Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., D.No.7-4-158,^{HotelSamratComplex,} tvlain Road, Bala Nagar, Hyderabad. Rep. by its^{Chairman Pabba Balaiah.}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constittition^{of India prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction,^{moreparticularly a writ in} the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring^{the action of the respondents2 and 3} herein in not initiating any action nor^{releasingthe petitioners amountto a tuneof} Rs.14,01,663/- and subsequent^{interest lying in the petitionerscurrent} A/c. No.100040060003996 in the 3rd^{respondentBank, as illegal, arbitrary and} direct the respondent No.3 herein^{to forthwith release the said amount in favour of} the petitioner herein.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶17

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to forthwrth release a sum o[ Rs.^'14,0.1 ,6631- along with current interest lying in the petitioners current A/c. No.100040060003996 in the 3rd respondent Bank.

¶18

counser ror the Petition"' ' :fl t$i"ulARY,li"^1,tiri^"^*

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{J. SREENTVASRAO}

¶22

WRIT PETITION^{No.276O4of 2023}

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

' Sri Swapna Gumpula,^{Iearned counsel representing} Dr. B. Karthik Navalan,^{learned counsel for the petitioner} seeks permission^{of this Courtto withdraw the writ petition} with a liberty to^{avail remedies as available underlaw'}

¶25

2- [n view ol the^{above submission, the writ petltlon 1s} dismissed as^{ri'ithdrarvtlgran ting liberty to the petitioner} as sought for.^{No costs}

¶26

Pending miscellaneous^{applications,ifany, shall}

¶27

stald closed.

¶28

SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// F SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To, 1. One CC to SRI B.KARTHIK NAVAYAN, Advocate. IOPUC]

¶30

Two CCs to GP FOR COOPERATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶31

Two CD Copies.

BSK GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 11112023

3{A1 E 6 A
o
t)
1r N[\ Tit\ d
d t *
r DES pd

¶38

ORDER

¶39

WP.No.27604 of²⁰²³

¶40

DISMISSING^{THE WRIT PETITION} AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ,-}

¶41

@w'" go

Smt.a.Ramadevi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.a.Ramadevi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Supreme Paints and Coatings Vs The Gram Panchayat

Sri. Podugu Naga Rambabu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

M/s. Jai Agros Vs The State of Telangana

The Jubilee Hills Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., Vs S. Padma Reddy (M.S.No.4792)

Jp Agarwalla Family Trust Vs The State of Telangana

Sabavath Jitender Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others