Petitioners challenged the failure of the EAMCET-AC convenor to issue notifications for engineering admissions under the SW-II-AC category for minority educational institutions. The High Court, noting the cause of action no longer existed, dismissed the petition as infructuous.
No order of relief granted as the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALL! NANDA
WRIT PETITION NOi 27572OF 20'|4
Between:
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1"t respondent in not issuing notification for conducting admissions into Engineering and Technical Courses for those [\ilinority Educational lnstitutions that have opted for SW ll-AC category of admission process including respondents 2 to 15 and permitting the said institutions to make admissions under spot admission category as illegal,
arbitrary and u nconstitutional and consequently direct the 1't respondent to forthwith issue a Notification for conduct of Counseling for admissions in to Engineering and Technical Courses for all colleges under SW-ll-AC category including Respondent Nos.2 to 15 and allot students for the academic year 201415.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP.NO:34532OF 20141
Petition Under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the l"trespondent to forthwith issue Notification and conduct Counseling for admissions into Engineering and Technical Courses to minority educalional institutions that have opted for SW-ll-AC counseling process for 2O14-15 including Respondents Nos.2 to 15, pending the disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI TARUN G. REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI THOOM SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 15 : --
The Court made the following ORDER
l tl i
HON'BLE MRS J U STICE SUREPA LINANDA
WRIT PETI TION No.27572 OF 20L4
ORDER:
The prayer as sought for by thepetitioners in the present writ petition reads as under:
\ \
"To issue an order writ or direction moreparticularly one in nature of writ of MANDUMUS declaring the actionof respondent No.1 in not issuing notification for conducting admissions into Engineering and Technical Coursesfor those Minority Educational Institutions thathave opted for SW II - . AC category of admissionprocess including respondent Nos.2 to 15 and permitting the said institutions to make admissions under spot admission category as illegal, arbitrary and u ncon stitution a I and consequently direct respondent No.1 to forthwith issue a Notificationfor conduct of Counseling for admissions into Engineering and Technical Courses for all colleges under SW-II-AC category including respondent Nos.2 to 15 and allot students for the academic year 2Ot4-15."
2
SN,] W.P.No.27572 of 2014
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-R. KARTHIKEYAN ASSrsrANr*t.ro
/
SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP Y(
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212023
e STATE
t
7
a
o [ 5 JhN ?t2[
,+
{.
I
OESP
^,1c<br>
ORDER
WP.No.27572 ot 2014
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
5 cq4ez5 Yr Afl"
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to issue admission notifications is maintainable.
Whether the cause of action for the writ petition survives for adjudication.
Mohd Aamer
Shaik Asifbaba
Mohd. Abdul Imran
Mohd. Farhamuddin
Mohammed Waieed
Mohd. Sufiyan
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
