Guntoju Sadguna Chary v. D. Venkateswarlu
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order barring construction on public land, the Court found no violation because the structure existed before the petitioner took over. The contempt case was consequently closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE ' PRESENT
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO :1537 0F 2023
contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act 197'l , praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent herein and Respondent No. 5, for wiilful violation and disobedience of the order of this Honorabre court passed in w.p.No. 26235 of 2016 dated 22-06-2023 . Between:
- Guntoju Sadguna Chary, S/o yadagiri, Aged about 4g years, Occ. agriculture R/o Lenkalapally Village Marrigudem Mandat Nalgonda District.
- Biyala Mallesham, S/o Late Narahari aged about 65 years Occ. Business Rl/o Flat No. 301, B Block, Madhavaram Serenity, Sagar Road, Karmanghat Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District.
- ...PETITIONERS/PETIT]ONERS
AND
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Respondent violated the interim order dated 22.06.2023 restricting construction on public road or government land.
Whether the contempt petition should be allowed following the explanation of the Court hierarchy.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Guntoju Sadguna Chary
- petitioner
Biyala Mallesham
- respondent
D. Venkateswarlu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1537/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court