The High Court closed Contempt Case No. 1845 of 2023. The court accepted the submission that the petitioner's representation was considered by the respondent company via a speaking order dated 10.07.2023, superseding the original conditional order.
Contempt proceedings closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32521
oF TELANGANA rN rHEHrGH "orTffl$otJ*lBtstE
FRIDAY, THEFIRST DAYOF DECEMBER 'rw"<iiHousntlo eruo TWENTY rHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLEMRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
coNTEMPTCASENo:1845 of2023
ContemptCasefiled UnderSections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish therespondenthereinfor willfully violating the orderof the HighCourt datedOT -12-2022 passedin W P'No'47951of 2018'
Between:
"'PETtrtoNERs
AND
RESPONDENTS
Counselfor the Petitioners:SRI V' SRIRANGANAYAKULU
Counselfor the FlesPondents:SRI SREE HARSHA REDDY(SCSINGARENI coLLERIES)
The Courtmade 1:hefollowing:ORDER
, I
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA TEMPT CA No.1 45 f o2
ORDER:
Complaining the violation of the order of this Court dated 07.12.2022, passed in W.p.No.47951 of 2018, the petitioner has filed the present contempt case.
"Without going into merits of the .case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1't respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 2g.06.2018, in accordance to law, and in particular, taking into consideration Clauses 16 and 17 of G.O.Ms.No.1 dated 02.0t.2016 and pass appropriate orders, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, duly communicating the said decision to the petitioners. However, there shall be no order as to costs.,.
2
SNJ CC.No.lE45 of2023
pursuEnce to the orders of this Court dated 07.L2.2022 passed in W.t,.No.47951 of 2018, the representation of the petitioner dated 28.06.2018 has been considered and a detailed speaking order had been passed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.MANJULA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
To,
SECTION OFFICER
w
t
\
HIGH COUIIT DATED:0111212023
ORDER
CC.No.1845 ot 2023
.:..
)>
!) 2 7 [[B 2[24
(-- .,5
* *
.=E El.iiC
CLOSINGiTHE CONTEMI'TCASE
q. A{'?{a'I
ffi*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner violated the High Court order dated 07.12.2022 in W.P. No. 47951 of 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri G. Nageswara Rao & Others
Sri N Sridhar
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd
Sri Sreeharsha Reddy
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
