Dismissed

G Bhakshi Naik v. Principal Secretary

Telangana HC7 Nov 2023WP/27076/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner G. Bhakshi Naik withdrew a writ petition challenging a punishment order. The Court permitted the withdrawal with liberty to approach the Court in the event of failure of the alternative remedy, and dismissed the petition. No order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Permitted withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition if relief not granted in alternate remedy; No order as to costs.

G Bhakshi Naik Vs Principal Secretary — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^321s 1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH^{DAY OF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYTHREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEV!}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO; 27076^{OF 2021}

¶7

Between:

¶8

G Bhakshi Naik, S/o: Late^{G Pool SinghNaik' Ag,qdapo-u!-3p.years, Stores} Offi"ei O and T,'Zonal Work^{Shop, Karimnagar, H.No.10-2-820/1Vidya nagar} Karimnagar

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

ANO

¶11

Principal Secretary,^{Transport, Roads and Buildings Department,Erramanzil,} Hyderabad.

¶12

The Managing Director^{TSRTC, Bus Bhavan, Hyderabad,Telangana'}

¶13

The Executive Director^{Engineering, TSRTCBusBhavan}

¶14

Chief^personal manager,^{TSRTC Headoffice Busbhavan}

¶15

The Controller of^{stores, ZS Karimnagar}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under A(icte 226 ot^{the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances statedⁱⁿ the^{affidavitfiled therewith, the High court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or^{direction more particularlyone in the nature_of} writ of Mandamus declaring^{the punishment imposedby the thirdrespondentl.e.} Executive Director'(E) vidl^{proceedings No AM/227(1)/2019 SOD and T KR} dt:28t1Ot2O2O as^{illegalarbitrary, set aside, the same and grant relief to the} petitioner in the interest of ,ustice^{and fair play.}

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SR! PAVAN KUMARA.B'L'N'}

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.l: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS}

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.2 to 5: SRt A. RAVI EABUSC FOR TSRTC}

¶21

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶22

THE HON'BLE SMT. WSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.27O76 of 2O2l

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner seelcs permission of this Court to withdrau. the present Writ Petition and has also filed a letter dated 03. ll.2023 to the Registrar (.Iudicial) stating as under

¶26

"l humblg submit that petitioner G.Bhakshi Naik, uhile working Jiled urit petition No.27O26 oJ 2027, before this Hon'ble High Court challenging the puntshment order imposed. bg the respondents.

¶27

Notu, the petttioner submits a letter dated 03.11.2O23 requesting for uithdratual of uit petition filed bg him and he u.)alts to pursue the matter u.tith respondent bg uag of appeal and reuision further.^{The letter is enclosedherewitlL}

¶28

It is praged that, this Hon'ble Court may permit the petitioner to wtthdratu the case with a libertg to file fresh utit petition in case relief is not granted in the altemate remedg in the interest of justice and for isxte of necessary orders."

¶29

Permission is accorded

¶30

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with

¶31

libert5z as prayed [or. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶33

SD/.K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANI REGISTRAR //rRUE cOPYi/ qD SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

1 2 One One CC CC to to Sri Sri A Pavan Ravi Kumar Babu SC A.B.L.N., for TSRiCroFnbi- Advocate tOpUCl^- 3 Two CCs to Gp for Roads Buitdingr, H,g[b;r,ti6r the State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI

¶36

4 Two CD Copies

TJ SB

HIGH COURT

DATED:0711112023

ORDER

WP.No.27O76 of 2O21

1 g SrArS
(
q
C)
o ?5 Nti il:
{i
t
i DFsr pi j (:, o

¶43

DISMISSING THE WRIT^{PETITIONAS WITHDRAWN} WITHOUT COSTS.

¶44

"r)
'y

G Bhakshi Naik v. Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Bhakshi Naik v. Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri a Seenaiah Vs The State of Telangana

B.Ramesh Vs The Telangana State Power Generation of Company Limited (Tsgenco)

Lingathoti Dayakar Vs The State of Telanagana

G Bhakshi Naik Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Battari Shyamala Vs The State of Telangana

Prof. K. Benjamin Vs Osmania University