Disposed

Smt. Battari Shyamala v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Nov 2023WP/25232/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner, a nurse, sought a direction to allocate a local cadre Zone-I Kaleshwaram position on spouse grounds. The High Court, exercising its power under Section 151 CPC, directed the respondents to consider a specific representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider the representation dated 12.10.2023 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Smt. Battari Shyamala Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²¹⁹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

TUESDAY,^{THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER} --TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SMTJUSTICEP.MADHAVI DEVI}

¶6

WRIT^{PETITIONNO:2 5232 0F2023}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt.^B Nurse, Hfl^rJtffi fi^{HJkllH,.*ruJ,3r,rudr'ilt?r:,ji#} District District ,^{retangin"State-504 207} ...PETITIoNER

¶9

...PETITIoNER

¶10

AND

¶11

:i?!ft^{"iif,ii?i+:ffi fi"'}"#;+ffif:f 15j'[is:e"""ff ;:::H-} , [i.e.n8icarano^{Hearth officer,Jasityar, Jasitvat District, Telansana} State'

¶12

...RES'ONDENTS

¶13

Petition^{under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} filed^therewith '^{the High Courtmay be} circumstances^{statedin tn"} "ntdn pr""."o'[o^ssue :l "'::TJIi:l:: i: x":Hi:"JJ""""""1, : r nature^{of writ of Mandamus'-ol'::""-';} as^{per G.oMs'No'317} ^r'rorr, a nd considering^{the AppticationForm-llldr'15 12'2021'",1"t-,tr,"]*am,} dtOO¹²²⁰²¹ '^{seeking tl' u"o""" local cadre' Zone-lKaleshwaram'} ;;;;;";",, "" "^,.,.-+ :l,T *ll; Articre i i^{14;1€,,rocate} lr,';y: H ::: rocar^cadre'Zone-r ::"ff:::^{,;ffff;'"'"u"'} D^{s'1r c'i} "'1he h#:f::':,"::T:;'::':lT'ilffi#;; O",nton"',^{in the interest of lustice'}

¶14

¶15

IA NO: 10F 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 15i CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased.to DIRECT the respondents to arocate rocar cadre, Zone-r Kareshwaram, as crear vacancy at PHC, Hazipur, Mancherial District, to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner: SRI p.VENKANNA Counsel for the Respondents: Gp fOiSgiVfCgS U

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

' i--7/ //

,l I

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{P.MADHAVIDEVI}

¶23

w.P.No.25232 of 2o23

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

In this Writ Petition, the petitioner^{is seeking a Writ} of Mandamus, declaring^{the action of the respondentsin} not considering^{the ApplicationForm-III, dated 15'12'2027} of the petitioner in^{terms ofG'O'Ms'No'317,dated} 06.72.2021 for allocation^{of local cadreon spouse grounds} as illegal and arbitrary^{arrd to pass such other order or} orders.

¶26

\ \

¶27

Learned counsel^{for the petitioner submitted} that the^{petitioner has made arepresentationon} 12.10.2023,^{which has been forwardedto the lst 61d lnd} respondents^{vide letter dated 16'10'2023 and is seekinga} direction^{to the respondentsto considerthe same and to} pass apPropriate^{orders thereon'He thereforelimited his} prayer to^{a directionto the respondentsto dispose of his} representation^{dated l2'lo'2023'}

¶28

Learned^{Government Pleader for Services-Il is} also^{heard on behalf of the respondents'}

¶29

tq. ('l

¶30

¶31

Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has made a representation dated 12.10.2023, this Court deems it fit ald proper to direct the respondents to consider the SAINC and to pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶32

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶34

writ petition, shall stand closed

¶35

¶36

SD/-MOHD.ISMAIL ASSISTA]IqREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qb SECTION OFFICER

¶37

¶38

1 ILg lll^{gipel qecretary, J\4edica.ta nd HeatthDepartment, Secretariat,} Hyoerabad, I_elangana, State of Telangana _500 004.

¶39

2 lhe Dtrector Public Health and Family Welfare, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶40

J The District lrrledical and Health Officer, Jagityal, Jagityal District, Telangana State.

¶41

4 One CC to SRI P.VENKANNA, Advocate IoPUCI 5 Two ccs to GP FoR SERVTCES-il, Hign 'c;urti6r the state of rerangana, at Hydcrabad. [OUTI

¶42

6 Two CD Copies PSK. BSI

CC^TODAY I l

HIGH^COURT

PMD,J

DATED:07^t1112023

ORDER

WP.No.25232^{of 2023}

¶50

16i SIATE
(
7
a
ct) I B NI\ 7\fl3 o
,r
t
t
DEsp,r-rc

¶51

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION} WITHOUT^COSTS. 6o.0 w-.A*\€

Smt. Battari Shyamala v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Battari Shyamala v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri a Seenaiah Vs The State of Telangana

B.Ramesh Vs The Telangana State Power Generation of Company Limited (Tsgenco)

Lingathoti Dayakar Vs The State of Telanagana

G Bhakshi Naik Vs The State of Telangana

G Bhakshi Naik Vs Principal Secretary

Prof. K. Benjamin Vs Osmania University