A petitioners writ petition challenging a circular regarding veterinary exams is dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Telangana due to lack of cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s2 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR - AT HYDTJREABITTEOF TELANGANA (Speciat Original .luriiaiction;
rlqg^D4y, rHE FtFrH DAy OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:25682 oF 2014
Between:
Miss M. Sandhya Rani. Dlo^-J\I. _Deva$gs, aged. about 23 years, R/o Veterinary College Hostel, Raiendranagar, HVci"rr.n"U-
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT 01 MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or order ordirection declaring the Circular No.16/Acad.111114,dt.27.8.2014 issued by the respondent No.3 is illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable and setaside the same and consequently direct the respondents topermit thepetitioner to write examof Veterinary Clinical Medicine Paper-l (Theory) to be conducted on5.9.2014and Veterinary Clinical Medicine Paper-1(Practical) tohe conductedon 12-9.2O14-
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1:GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2 & 3: SRI AKA VENKATARAMANA'SC FOR SRI VENKATESWARAVETERINARY UNIVERSITY
The Court madethe following: ORDER
HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
ON 2 6 2 4
ORDER:
counselaPPearing on behalf of the Heardlearned petitioner,learned GovernmentPleader for AnimalHusbandry appearingon behalf of respondent No'l and Mr Aka Venkataramana,learned standing counsel appearingon behalf ofrespondent Nos'2 & 3'
2 Thepetitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
"to issue a WRIT OFMANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ ororder or direction declaring the Circular No.16/Acad.Illl14,dt'27.08.2014issued by the respondent No.3 is illegal, arbitraryand unsustainable and set aside the sameand consequently direct the respondents topermit the petitioner to writ exam of Veterinary Clinical Medicine Paper-I (Theory) to be conducted on 5.9.2014 and Veterinary Clinical Medicine Paper-I (Practical) to be conducted on 12.9.2014 and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances OF the case..,
)
4, Recording the submissionof learned standing counsel appearingon behalf of the respondent- University, theWrit Petition isdismissedas infructuous.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel,the miscellaneous petitions' if any' pending in theWrit Petition shall also standclosed'
ossrsrni?'if.f$ii //rRUE coPYI/ .="r,osrr,"a*
'"l ?l?.ffii:^i$',J[[ftffi,a.f88 ^* 4. TwoCD CoPies BN GJP B.t
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0511212023
ORDER
WP.No.25682 of 2014
€ STATE
1
7
l ts sLt $8 (l
*
CI
t o pdi a,',^(
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS wtTHOtJT cosTs
@*rp-
Bru-lt { lL l-o 2,1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Miss M. Sandhya Rani
The State of Telangana
Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, College of Veterinary Science
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
