The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging a university circular regarding academic results. The court held the cause of action did not survive and the petition was infructuous.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:25552 OF 2014
Between:
All are Rl/o. Veterinary College Hostel, At Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the circular No.16/Acad.l11114, dt.27.08.2014 for the subjects i) Veterinary Clinical Medicine
,7
Paper-1, ii) Veterinary Pharmacology Paper-ll, iii) Veterinary Surgery and Radiology Paper-|, iv) Veterinary Preventive l/edicine Paper-l and v) Veterinary Gynecology and Obstetrics Paper-|, and consequentlypermit the Petitioners togo with the academic results by appearing for the Annual Examinations for theyear 2014
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 2&3: SRI AKAVENKATARAMANA,
STANDING COUNSEL
The Court made the following: ORDER
, I
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.25552 of 2014
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Animal Husbandry appearing on behalf of respondent No,1 and Mr Aka Venkataramana, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 & 3.
"to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the circular No. L6l Acad.llll!4, dt.27.O8.2O14 for the subjects i) Veterinary Clinical Medicine PaperI, ii) Veterinary Pharmacology Paper-II, iii) Veterinary Surgery & Radiology Paper-I, iv) Veterinary Preventive Medicine Paper-I and v) Veterinary Gynecology & Obstetrics PaperI, and consequently permit the Petitioners to go with the academic results by appearing for the Annual Examinations for the year 2Ot4 and orders may be passed accordingly in the interest of justice."
2
sNi
to the notice of the Court that the cause of action in the present writ petition does nct survive for adjudication, any more
4 Recording the submission of learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent_ university, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shalt be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall also stand closed.
SD/. V. HARI PRASAD
\l
//TRUE COPYII
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
6
HIGH COURT
DATED:0511212023
ORDER
1 HE Sr4 14:
(
t
L)
0 3 ,li i' 7[21 i,
* t)r-.!;r
WP.No.25552 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS TNFRUCTbUS WITHOUT COSTS
rR
25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition raising an issue regarding the university's circular on admitting petitioners to examinations survives for adjudication.
K. Santosh Kumar and others
The Principal Secretary (Animal Husbandry)
Sri Venkateshwara Veterinary University
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
