The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition initiated in 2008 for non-prosecution after listing it for dismissal in 2023 due to lack of representation or explanation by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3256 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVIONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY oF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 2392 oF 2008
Betweenl
P Ramesh Kumar., S/o Peera.lu, Rio. 36, Brindavan Colony, Nizampet Road. Kukatpally. Hyderabad 2 P Krishna Bflgndr? Kumat, S/o. Perraju, R/o. 36, Brindavan Colony, Nizamabad. !-ep^byhis GPA HolderP Ramesh Kumar, s/o. Perraju, agedabout 52 years. R/o 36 Brrndavan Colony Nizamapet Road, Kukatpally,-
AND
1 Govt. of Andhra Pradesh.. Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department. Secretariat Hyderabad
4 Shark Ahmed., S/o Late tbrahim Saab, Major R/o. Late lbrahim Sabb, Aged Malor Rio Nandrgama Village. Patancheru Mandal, Medak District.
R5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 20-6-2011 in WPMP no. 27295 of 2008)
...RESPONDENTS Petitron under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affldavtt filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Wnt Order or dtrectron. one more particularly one in the nature of a "Wnt 01' Certrorarr" (r) Calling for the records relating to the orders of the2nd respondent rn proceedings No F3/ 10680/2006-F3/49/ROR/2006, dated 29-1-2008, and quash rhe same as being rllegal arbitrary. u nconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Ap Rights rn Land & Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 and rules made there under Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. VENKAT REDDY (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No. 4: SRI B. KRISHNA KUMAR
counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI K, SRINIVASA CHARY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEE]R KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.2392 OF 2OO8
ORDER
Thou qli the matter ',r'a s listed bercrr: trr s Court on Ol.O3 2023 and 12.O4.20'211, thcrc \,as no rt:prcst.l ation lor [he petitioncrs. IJenct:, the nlattcr \,:ls directccl tr> t,i, Iislcd under the caption 'Fcr Dismrssal'oL'r 2,1.04.2023.
As a ;e(lucl. mi:,.(.llirtr( ()Lt:i [)etitions, pt nding il an5, in
this Writ Ft;t rir;n, s-.h.rll strrrrd rlrsrtrissr:cl. No r:rrsls
Sd/ MOHt) SANAULLAH ANSARI AI;SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// c>.'
S[:CTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sr P VenkatRedov Advocate IOPUCI
a. Two CCs t(r( P Fcr RevenueHlgh Courtfor the State of T:l:rng:rna' [OUT] 5. Two CD Copi:s MBC AQ
PAc,
HIGH COURT
DA.TE:D: 2410412023
1[8
u'
'a
ORDER
Wl).Ncr.2392 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION, I^/ITI{OUT COSTS
(tpnc -.ti \r-!'
P Ramesh Kumar
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
The Joint Collector
The Mandal Revenue Officer
Shark Ahmed
Mallepalli Laxma Reddy
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
