The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 23417 of 2018 for non-prosecution. Despite multiple adjournments, the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date of 10.11.2023, leading to the discharge of the writ.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 23417 OF2018
Between:
f\iluooaneni srikanth,s/o. Late Seshagirirao,aged 42 years, Rl/o. Mallaram Village, Oinimapeta Mandal,Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, Telangana State'
.....PETITIONER
AND
(All are residents of Malkaram Village Dammapeta Mandal,Khammam biitiict)(RR 6 to 9 are brought on recordas per LRs of the deceased neipo,i<ientNo.S,as per the Court Order dated15-02-2023 in l A No 1 of 2023).
.....RESPONDENTS
petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High courtmaybe
pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of CERTIORARI call for the records pertaining to orderspassed by the 2nd respondent in CMA No.2'112008, dated 19-06-2017 and a set aside the same. l.A.NO:2 OF 2018
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including eviction of the petitioner from the land covered in RS No.57 an extent of Ac.9.04 Gts sitauted at Mallaram Village, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadrad ri-Kothagudem District by suspending the orders passed in CMA No.2112008, dated 19.06.2017 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 9 : SRI T.V.RAMESH
The Court made the following ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICD NAGESH BHEEMAPAI{A
WRIT PETITION NO.23417 of 2018
ORDER:
'lhis court inspite of granting severar adjournments, petitioner did not choose to prosecute his case.
on 03.1 1.2023, this matter is posted under the caption ,,for dismissal,, adjourning to 10.1 1.2023, and today also i.e., lo.ll.2o23 when the marter is called, none appeared for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non_prosecution. ,lhere shall be no order as to costs
Miscel.laneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, sha[ stand closed.
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTAN TREGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
sEcTlo OFFICER
SA cJA{F
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011112023
rt\ E STAI e
,
oo 22 JA}l z$zt i
*
I
D€ sparc
ORDER
WP.No.23417 of 2018
DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON - PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
d
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition numbered 23417 of 2018 required dismissal for non-prosecution in the absence of the petitioner on the hearing date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
f. Iluooaneni Srikanth
The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department
The Addl. Agent to Govt. Project Officer, ITDA
The Spl. Dy. Collector(TW)
The Tahsildar, Dammapeta Mandal
Matta Gopal Rao and others (Represented by LRs)
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
