This judgment dismisses a writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear on the date fixed for dismissal despite previous adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 22566 OF 2018
Between:
Muppaneni Vasantha D/o.M.Seshagiri Rao, aged 39 years, Fl/o. Mallaram Village, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of wirt of CERTIORARI call for the records pertaining to orders passed in LTR case No.4712015, daled- 17.O8.20'17 on the file of 3rd respondent and sel aside the same on the ground that they have no power to reoperr lhe issue as settled in LTR case No.1273194, dated- 25.04,1995 in respect of the land covered.in RS No.48/A an extent of Ac.12.00 Gts situated at Mallararn Village, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhad rad ri-Kothagudem District.
( I
1A NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto stay of all furtherproceedings includingthe eviction of the petitionerfrom the land covered in RS No.48/A anextentof Ac.12.00 Gts situatedat Mallaram Village' Dammapela Mandal, Bhadradri-KothagudemDistrictpursuant to the order passed by the 3rd respondent in LTR case No.47l2O1slDpt,dtd.17.08.2017.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRIP.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the RespondentsNo.1to4 : GP FORSOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO.22566 of 2018
ORDER:
This Court inspite ofgranting severaladjournments, petitioner did not
choose to prosecute his case.
On 03. I I.2023, this matter ispostedunderthe caption "for dismissal adjourning to 10. 11.2023, andtoday also i.e., lO.7'1.2023when the matter is called, none appeared for thepelitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissedfor non-prosecution. There shall
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, ifany, pending in this Writ Petition, shall
stand closed.
SO/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTAN RAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Tribal WelfareDepartment Secretariat,Stateof Telangana, Hyderabad. 2 The Agent to Govt./ District Collector, Bhadradri-KothagudemDistrict, Bhadradri-Kothagudem. 3 The Spl. Dy. Coll-ector (TW), Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri-KothagudemDist , . 4 The tahsiidar, Damniapeia Mandal, Damrnapeta,Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.
5 One CC to SRI P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR,Advocate. [OPUC] 6 Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE,High Courtfor the Stale of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 7 Two CD Copies. BSK
GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011112023
ORDER
a .ETAT€ oF
t
o
s ? ttB ?$'ll
'J .t;'
*
fEsPATC:
WP.No.22566 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
c$u G*
Muppaneni Vasantha
State of Telangana
District Collector
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
