Dismissed
Badiga Potharaju, v. The joint Collector
Telangana HCWP/22987/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22987 OF 2009
Between:
Badiga Potharaju, S/o.Subba Rao, Retired D.S.P. R/o.10-1-560, West Maredpally, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Case No. D5/2165/2009, dated-0809-2009 by the 1st respondent i.e. Joint Collector as illegal, arbitrary, void and against to principles of naturaljustice.
1.A. NO: I OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 29847 OF 2009)
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner for suspend the proceedings Case No. D5/2'165/2009, dated:08-09-2009 by the 1st respondent i.e. Joint Collector.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.S.VENKATARAMANA
Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents: SRI J.KANAKAIAH The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
\ITRIT PETITION No.22987 of2OO9
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 12.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter was posted to 78.L2.2O23. Again on 19.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed to list the matter on 2l .12.2023 under the caption for dismissal'. Inspite of the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal', today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not having aly interest in prosecuting the matter.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand dismissed.
I
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR ' //TRUE COPYII YY ,_)./'/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
^GJP
t\&
HIGH COURT
DATED:2611212023
ORDER
WP.No.22987 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Badiga Potharaju
Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad
Special Grade Dy. Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer
Mandal Revenue Officer, Shameerpet Village and Mandal
S.R.Vanamala Lingam
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court