Chirra Lingaiah, v. Mr. Murukuntla Amarnath
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed the contempt case on the respondent's representation that he had complied with the earlier order dated 04.11.2015, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority if so advised.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to petitioner to seek other remedies.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENry SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
rii' +: c'
coNTEMPT C NO:752 oF 2016
. --contemptcase firedunder Sections 10 to 12 0f contempt of courts Act 1971 to summon the contemnor / respondent trerein ano punish him for his wirffur 9j*-b$l:1". No.34866/201s.inimptementingthe order Oi.O+_it_ZOtS p"s".O in Wp
Between:
Chirra Linqaiah. S/o Ramchandraiah, Aged 4g years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o Ramanujapuram Viilage, NarsirntriiifLt i,tJijd,fraranser oist.
.. *:-,.-.i;'s..i ;;,'..,+:j'' .. _, ..:s:'. r" q.'
...pETtTlONER/Writ petitioner
AND
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's claim of compliance with the earlier order warrants closure of the contempt case without further adjudication.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chirra Lingaiah
- respondent
Mr. Murukuntla Amarnath
Coram
J. Sreenivas Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/752/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court