This order dismisses Writ Petition No. 16579 of 2009 for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear or place representation on the court on consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16579 OF 2009
{
I
| Between: | |
|---|---|
| I.Ms. N.Ramakantham, D/o. N.SatyanarayanaMurtlry, agedabout3? years,Occ: software Engineer, Rzo.H.No.l2-2-823lC/19,Chakrapuri, SBI Colony, Santoshnagar,Mehdipatnam,Hyderabad. 2.ArjulaRamachandraReddy, S/o.SriArjulaRaghavendra Reddy, agedabout62 years,Occ:Retd.UniversityEmployee, Rro.H.No.3-33-3l,L.V.ReddyCotony, Serilingampally,Hyderabad. 3.MirSajjadAli,S/o.tareMir AliBaksh, agedabout53 years,Occ:.Employee, Rro.H.No.23-I-342,AlijahKottla, JaffreyGally,Hyderabad. |
|
| 4.Smt.Basalathunnisa"W./o.SriImadulHaqAkheel, | |
| ( | agedabout52 years,Occ: Housewife, Rto.H.No.I7-8-617, FeteyabKhan Bazar, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. |
| 5.A.Gopalkishna,S/o. SriM.V.Narasimha,. agedabout37 years,Rro.H.No.l259/A, RoadNo.36, JubileeHills,Hyderabad 6.NaldanavanamVenkataSubrahmanyarn, S/o- lateN.V.D.LashmanRao, agedabout44 years,Occ: Employee, Rlo.H.No.63-B,EastMarredpatli,Secunderabad-26. 7.Smt.J.Nagaratnam,W/o. SliPrabhakar Rao, age!about49 years,Occ: Household, R/o.H.No.5-69,Adarshnagal Colony, SerilingampallyMandal,Hyderabad. E.Y.BabuRao,S/o.RamachaMraiah, aged about62years.Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.I2-2-823la./7ISantoshnagar, Mehdipatnam,Hyderabad. |
|
| 9.Smt.P.\redavathiTayaru, Wo.Y.V.Ramanuja Swamy, aged aboutz16years,Occ: Household, Rlo.H.No.9-I-I2E18Prasantnagar, Laagerhouse, Hyderabad-8. |
|
10.P.Mahender Reddy,S/o.P.Mohan Reddy, agedabout57 years,Occ:Gort.Service, R/o.H.No.A-22, Univcrsity ofHydcrabadCarnpus, CentralUniversityPost, Hyderabad-134. |
q
-s
aged about 52 yean, Ooc: Employee,
Rro.Q.No.29 E, University of Hyderabad Campus. Central University P.O., Hyderabad- I34,
7
5
Petitioners
AND
Respondents
F.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus for the declaration that the respondents cannot take steps to close the existing 50 feet road which is only the approach to the residential houses to be built in the plots of the petitioners and similarly situated persons plots in ,Sy.No.203southern part of KondapurVillage, thereby protectthe easementary right the ingress and egress to the petitioners plots is blocked and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in ingress and egress of the existing 50 feet road.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 21769 OF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any steps in blocking or objecting usage of existence 50 feet road for ingress and egress of their respective plots of the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ANIL KUMAR PATTAPARLA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel forthe Respondent No.I to 3, 5 & 7: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s. G.SUDHA, SC FOR APHB
Gounsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI M.DHANANJAY REDDY, SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for the Respondent No.8: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
Y
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEJ. SREENWAS RAO
WRIT PETITIONNo. L6579 of 2OO9
ORDER:
When the matterwas taken up for hearing on 19.12.2023,there was no representationon behalf of the petitioners, in themorning and afternoonsessions'To give one opportunity,the matter was posted to 2l '12 '2023 underthe caption*for dismissal".
Pending miscellaneousapplications,ifany, shall
stand closed.
//TRUECOPY//
^,,?3+^t+G3F+iiRZ SECTIOYOFFICER
BSR YeSB
*:4--<-=' \J-'__rv^--. ----
I i I I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 26t12t2021
ORDER
li
STAT€
1
co 1[ Jh\ 2$?[
* 1,y''
lD:-- '
WP.No.165z9 of 2oo9
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION,
WITHOUT COSTS
1oc€a tra
I.N.Ramakantham
State of A.P.
J. Sreevivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
