Dismissed

Ahmed Mujtaba Shareef, v. The Joint Collector

Telangana HC25 Apr 2023WP/22425/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioner to change counsel under Section 151 CPC. On an uncontested hearing involving out-of-court settlement between the petitioner's elders and respondent counterparts, the petitioner withdrew the writ petition, which was consequently dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to change counsel and to withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Ahmed Mujtaba Shareef, Vs The Joint Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁶ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶7

l.A.No.l ANO 2OF 2022

¶8

IN/AND

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 22425 OF 2012

¶10

Between:

¶11

Ahmed Mujtaba Shareef, S/o. Late Yousuf Shareef, aged about 54 years, Rl/o. 8-1-366/M135, Janaki Nagar Colony, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar Districf at Mahabubnagar.

¶15

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar Division at Mahabubnagar

¶16

2 The Tahsildar, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶17

Mankala Ranga Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, R/o. Vijayanagar Colony, Shadnagar Proper, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶18

lhteshamul Haq, S/o. Mohd. lmam, Rl/o. Choulapally, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶19

Qiamulla Haq, S/o. lmam Mohammed, R/o. Choulapally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶20

Syed Abdul Hakeem, S/o. Abdul Raheem, Rl/o.Choulapally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the revisional orders of the 1"t respondent in Case Nos.D1192/2008 (File D11516412009) and Case No.D1196/2009 (File No.D115168/2009) and consequently direct the respondents to continue the name of the petitioner as owner and possessor in respect of the subject land totally admeasuring Ac.22-21 guntas in Sy.Nos.412 (Ac.3-22 guntas), 413 (Ac.4-06 guntas), 415 (Ac.7-04 guntas), 427 (Ac.3-17 guntas) and 438 (Ac.4-13 guntas) of Choulapally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶23

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012^(WPMP. NO:287 42 0F²⁰¹²¹

¶24

Petition under Section^'l 5'1 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in:;upport of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleased to} stay the operation and effect of the order of^{the1s' respondentdated 1 1 .O5.2012} in Case Nos.Dl/92l20t)B^(File No.D1/5164/2009)^{and Case No.D1/96/2009(File} No.D1/5168/2009),^pending disposal of the^{writ petition.}

¶25

!A NO: 1 OF 2022

¶26

Petition under Sr--ction 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in siupport^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} permit the petitioner to change his counsel and engage Sri. G. Raiu^{advocate (} ) for withdrawal of writ Petition.

¶27

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶28

Petition under Se:ction^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} permit the petitioner b withdraw the writ^petition No.^{224251 2012 by not} pressing it.

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{M/s. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES}

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.4to 6:} ' "^-

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.7: SHAFATH AHMED KHAN}

¶33

The Court made the following:^ORDER

I I

I I

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENISUDHEERKUMAR} I.A.Nos. l^{AND2 0F 2022} IN AND WRIT PETI^{TIONNo.22 425 OF 2012}

¶38

COMMON ORDER

¶39

I.A.No. I of 2022^{is ltled by the petitionerseekingpermission} of this Corrrt to change^{his present learned counseland to engage} Sri G. Raju, Advocate,^{who filed this application'}

¶40

This matter came^{up for consideration yesterdayi'e'' on} 24.O4! heard by this^{Court and as therervas no} re behalf of^{M/ s. BharadwajAssociates,who is} n record for^{the petitioner, the matter was} learne{i 1, dir-ected to be listed under the^{caption 'ForOrders' to 25'04 2023'} 3. fbday, when the matter^{was called in the pre-lunchsession,} there was no representation on^{behalf ofM} /^{sBharaci''r'aj} Associates. Hence, the matter^{rvas passedover. Even inthe} post-lunch session, when the matter is called,^{onceagainthere is} no representation on behalf of M/s.^{BharadwajAssociates'}

¶41

In the light of the above, for the^{reasonsstated in the} accompanying aflidavit filed in^{support of I A.No' Iof 2022,} I.A.No.1 of 2022 is ordered^{and the petitioner is permitted to} change his present learned^{counseland toengage}

¶42

-==-

¶43

¶44

sri G.Rajr-r, advocatc, as Jris lcar^ed cou,ser to p.osecute the present Writ petition.

¶45

LA.No.1) of 2022 is filr:cl seeking permission of this Court t<r rvithdraw tl-ie Writ pctition. in the afhdavit filed in sr:pport of the application, it is stated th.t on intervention of eldcrs of petilioner and unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 7 have scttled the rnatter out of the Court arni,:ably and compromised the matter arrd thus, sought pet'mission of r_hi5 6o.r., to rvithdraw the Writ petition.

¶46

In the light of the a bove, perm.ission is grantecl to the pctitioner to withdrau, rhc Writ petition and accordingly, I.A.No.2 of 2022 is ordered. 7. In view of the order passed in I.A.No.2 of 2022. the Writ Petition is dismissed as withclraq,n.

¶47

As a sequel, miscellar.rcous petitions, pending if any in this Writ Petition, strall stand clo:.;ed. No costs;.

¶48

SD/- K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSTSTAULREGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY// LlD SECTION OFFICER

¶49

¶50

One CC to M/s. BFIARADWAJ ASSOCIATES, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana IOUT]

¶51

One CC to SRI SHAFATH AHMED KHAN, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies BN GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:2 510412023

COMMON ORDER

S TATE Or
tr9
t
( v
1$
i" tt \t
t
.f,
r D E SrrAl

¶56

f.A.No.1 AND 2 OF 2022 IN/AND

¶57

WP.No.22425 of 2012

¶58

ORDERING THE I.A. Nos. 1 & 212022 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶59

Ahmed Mujtaba Shareef, v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ahmed Mujtaba Shareef, v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Ramesh Kumar, Vs Govt. of Andhra Pradesh

Muddapati Mallikarjuna Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Yarala Komura Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Kuchipudi Kusuma Vs The State of Telangana

J. Gowramma Vs The State of Telangana

Andekar Jahangir Vs The Principal Secretary