Dismissed

The Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., v. v.Srinivas Reddy

Telangana HC18 Apr 2023WP/22032/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed Writ Petition No.22032 of 2002 filed by Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd. against an order of the Second Appellate Authority under the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing on three occasions, despite previous directions.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

The Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., Vs… — Banking and Recovery | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁷ ]

¶2

]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 22032 OF 2002

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer A. Rajan Rem Reddy, S/o.Hanumaye, Rl/o.Karimnagar.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 V. Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, (Died as per LRs)

¶12

2.^'$mt. Vijayalakshmi W/o Late V. Srinivas Reddy, Aged about 53^years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H.No.5-6-334, kapuwada, Karimnagar Town and District.

¶13

V. Swathi D/o Late V. Srinivas Reddy, Aged about 44^years, Occ:^not known, Fi,/o. H.No.5-6-334, kapuwada, Karimnagar Town and District.

¶14

V. Sailaja D/o Late V. Srinivas Reddy, Aged about 32^years, Occ: not known, Rl/o H.No.5-6-334, Kapuwada, Karimnagar Town and District.

¶15

(RR2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of deceased sole respondent as per C.O dated 18.04.2023 in l.A. No.1 o120221

¶16

...RESPONDENT

¶17

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to call for the records and quash the order daled 24.9.2002ⁱⁿ S.A.No.8i2001 on the file of Second^{Appellate Authority under Section a8l2lo't} A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 and^{Deputy Commissionerof Labour,} Warangal arising out of order dated 3.1.2001ⁱⁿ APSE^{Case No.1 of 1998 on the} file of Appellate Authority under Section^{48 of the A.P. Shops& Establishments} Act & Assistant Commissioner of^{Labour, Karimnagar, by issuing Writ of} Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction^{as the Hon'ble court.}

¶18

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2002(ryPMP. NO: 27605 OF 20021

¶19

Petition und,: " llection 151 CPC praying that ilt the li'curnstances stated in the affidavit fileC n support of the petition, the Hig r Court may be pleased to suspend the o perat lr of the Order dated 24.9.2002 in S.A.No.8/2001 on the file of Second l\ppel ,rt? Authority under Sec. 48(2) o A.Fr. Shops and Establishments A:t, 1l)88 and Deputy Commissioner cf Labr>u.r, V/arangal arising out of order dirte(j : 1 .2001 in APSE Case No.1 of 1998 on the file of Appellat Authorily u nde:r [ie ;ti rn 48 of the A.P. Shops & E:;tablish'nerrts Act & Asst. Commissioner of -a .rour Karimnagar, pending dispos:rl of tt e Wr t petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Pet ti()ner: SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI

¶21

Counsel for the Res oondents: - - - -

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.22O3 2 ofZOO2

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.03.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and therefore the matter was directed to be listed on 2O.O3.2O23 under the caption "For Orders,,. Thereafter, on 12.04.2023, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be listed on 18.04.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶27

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-

¶28

prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in

¶30

this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶31

sD/- K.SREERAMA^MURTHY ./ ASSISTANI-REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sE5fifN oFFrcER

¶32

To, 1. One CC to^{SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI' Advocate[OPUC]} 2. Two CD CoPies BN GJP

HIGH COUR'I

DATED:1Bt04t?.023

ORDER

-: -1--'-(- ATE
fr"
c
-D
{t<br>r.t $<br>c
r-) t,
.t,..j
.,,:' . /
r 1.11gnAI
:-. * _ --2-

¶37

WP.No.22032 of 2002

¶38

DISMISSING I HE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PRI)SECUTION WITHOUT CO J S

¶39

C\J

¶40

@o*"t 0- t\ h 'v1t 1d

The Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., v. v.Srinivas Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Karimnagar Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., v. v.Srinivas Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Srinivas, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Govindu Prameela Vs M.Suguna

M.Bal Raj, Hanumakonda,Jangaon,Warangal District Vs Apsrtc., v.C.and M.D., Musheerabad,Hyderabad and 2 Others

V.Krishna Mohan. Hyderabad Vs the Cheif Executive Officer., Vasavi Coop.Urban Bank Ltd.Hyd

Smt. Nafasath Ameena, W/o. Syed Siraj Hyder, Vs The Government of A.P.

V.Kista Reddy, Mahaboobnagar District. Vs Apsrtc, by Vc and Md., Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 2 Others