This order closes Writ Petition No. 13488 of 2007, rejecting the need for a fresh order on the petitioner's pay fixation claim as the matter had already been disposed of by a prior interim direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31671
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 13488 OF 2OO7
Between:
M.Bal Raj, S/o Sheakaraiah, aged about 57 years, Rl/o.H.No.4-2-28, Kothur street, Hanumakonda Jangaon, Warangal District
...PET|T|ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ more particualrly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the pay of the petitioner by adding yearly increments w.e.f.2003 is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner and to pay the consequential benefits which flows on his pay fixation
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. RAVI MOHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. GADOAM SRINIVAS(SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H:)N'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK RJOD,DY
WRIT PETITION No.13488 of2OO7
ORDER:
Wher:. r hc matter is taken up for hearing r.he learned counsel aprrc rrng on behalf of the petition,:r has stated t.hat pursuant t,r r.he interim direction issued by ttis Court on 28.06.2007 i: r W.p.M.p.No.16904 of 2OOT, the crrse of the petil.ioner has been considered and no further or<le:s need be passed in the nain rvrit petition.
2l Recor<lir 3 the above submission made lry. dre learned counsel, the W -it petition is closed.
The misr ellancous petitions pending, if any, s_ral[ stand
closed. Ther,: I eall be no order as to costs.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-K.SRr:E RAMA MURTHY ASSIS'TP.NT REGISTRAR /'ui
SEr:Tlr)N OFFICER
1 . One CC to SF . G. RAVI MOHAN, Advocate tOpUCl 2. one cc ro sRt GADDATU sRtNtvAS 1sC rO'n rSctc)[cptJC] 3. Two CD copier BM SB \k
HIGH COU IRT
DATED:1tt',t412023
ORDER
WP.No.134B| of 200t
E
a:
:
.. !q t.-
c:-
\ )
\i
CI.OSING THIi WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GC STS
-.*-
r
aefw laz
Sq)
i I l I I
M. Bal Raj
APSRTC
Aabhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
