This Civil Revision Petition challenged the trial Court's order dismissing an application for condonation of delay in filing a petition for restoration of a suit. The High Court found the trial Court's order reasoned and did not require interference.
This Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THEHIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
."S|','13'"S[JSXI','}I,?R+)"'l-[J''
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEA.ABHISHEK REDDY CIVIL REVISIONPETITIONNO:2379 0F 2022
Between:
Govindu Prameela, Wo. LateJoseph,Aged.50 years, occ. Household,Rl/o. r.rioir.uo, vrrnJii, i'airii of WarangalDistrict'
...PETITIONER/PLAI NTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Petition under Section 1 1 5 of CPC,1908 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 04-08-2022 passed in l.A. No.605of 2020 in O.S.No. 466 of 2010 on the file of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge atHanamkonda.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri J, VENKATESWARAREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.l : Sri RAMESHCHILLA
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : M/s. NYSHADHAMCHANDRASEKHAR
The Gourt made ihe following: ORDER
,I'HI' IION'I]I-B SRI JUS'TICE A. ABIIISI{EK IU]DI)Y CIvIL REVISION PETIl'lON No.2379 of 20.!2
ORD[,R:
Questioringthe order dated04.08.2022pas;e.1try the leamed[.{< ditional Senior Civil Judge.}{a ramkonda, dismissingI A No.605of 2020 in O.S.No.466 of llit10. filed bythe petition:r seeking to condonethe delay of 199,t days in filingthe pelit orr lbl'r'estorationof the above suil, by s;tting asidethe disn issal order of the suit dated 10.12.2)Ul, the presentCivilR:'uisionPetition hasbeen filed- _i, ,t** t Aperusa I of the affidavit filed in support of I.lr.Nc.605 f 2020tn O.S.No.466 of 2010 filed by the petitionerseoking conclonct.hr tlelay of 1994 days in filing the petition for toration of.he abovesuit, shows that it is ber:l'. ol any details and at solutelY,no validreasons art:giv,:rr b'r the ;6.petrtioner for c rndoning the abnormal delay of 1994 dirys i::1.a,,
Having regard to the above, the order under revision datecl 04 08.:20)2 passed by the trial Court in I.A.\o.6tl5 ol
..1
1\k. ., 2 c R r, ,, 23ro ur 2022
2020 in O.S.No.46(r of 2010 is a reasoncd one and thc same
does not require any interlerence by this Court
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECT N OFFICER
To,
Njb
kamlr.)'
HIGH COURT
AAR,J
DATED:1710412023
--'a'--'a
I )
R?
"..e
E:
ORDER
CRP.No.2379 of 2022
DISMISSING THE CI'/IL REVISION PETITION.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court order dismissing the application for condonation of delay and restoration of suit requires interference by this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Govindu Prameela
Suguna
The Warangal Education Officer
The District Education Officer
The LIC of India
The State of Telangana
A. ABHISHEK REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
