S.Bhasker v. The Superintending Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I3304l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 211148 OF 2018
Between:
S.Bhasker, S/o. Hanmanthu, aged about 49 years, Senior Assistant, O/o. District Roads and Buildings Officer / Executive Engineer, Nagar kumool, Nagar kurnool District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of t/andamus to declare that the transfer orders issued to the petitioner transferring him from the O/o. District (R&B) Officer, / Executive Engineer, Nagarkurnool District to the O/o. District (R&B) Officer / Executive Engineer, Nalgonda District vide Proc.No. E2lCounseling t7 45t2O18-361100, dated'14-6- 201'8 issued by the 1st respondent is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of transfer rules and guidelines on the subject and subversive of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and selaside the same and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for retention in the present place i.e. O/o. District (R&B) Officer i Executive Engineer, Nagarkurnool District with all service and monetary benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition lrnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the crr(.umstances stated in the affidavit liled i I r;upport of the petition, the High Cour. r'ray be pleased to direct the respc nder s to retain and continue the petit oner n the present place i.e. Oio. District (lRt 3 Officer / Executive Engineer, Naga-krrrnool District, by suspending ther ope alion of the impugned Proc.No. E2lC,)Lrns€ ling 17 4Sl2O1B36/100, daled 14-e-2 )18 ssued by the 1st respondent.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Between:
J.Rajeswari, Senior Mahabubnagar.
AND
Assistant, O/o. Superintending Eng rer,,rr,R&B), Circle, ...PETITIONER/PROPOSED Itt SpONDENT No.4
.RESPONDENTS
Petition u nder *rction 15'l CPC praying that in the ci'crrms;tances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Courl n ay be pleased to implead the prr:rposr I respondent No.4 herein as Party r::;porrdent No.4 in W.P.No.21448 of 2tl1 iirnri in l.A.No.1 of 2018.
Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRI P.AMARENDER
Counsel for the Resp rndents: cP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the I rllowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO .21448 0F 2018
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2 Permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition. 3. . Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed AS
withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
GJP ,),-
HIGH COUR]
DATED:0410tt2023
ORDFR
WP.No.21448 of 2018
,r'1ti\ H':; S fA I6:
29 AlJ8 2m i:i
:. t
<br>- r .7/
., .- ..j/
-. _:. -
DISMISS!NG"] HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRA'l/N WITHOUT CO ;TS
o ')-5
S.Bhasker
1. The Superintending Engineer, (R&B), Rural Circle, Balkampet, Hyderabad-16
Namavaru Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court