Writ petition seeking compassionate appointment and death benefit settlement for the petitioner was disposed of after she obtained permission to withdraw the petition during judicial proceedings.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition accorded; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAYOF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2't662 OF 2018
Between:
K. Bhavani, W/o. late K. Jaganmohan Raju,Aged about 48 years,Rl/o. SRT- 17, Tekulabasthi, Opp. Tilak Stadium,Bellampally, MancherialDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lnd iapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the 2nd respondent to actin accordance with law and to provide compassionate appointment to thepetitioner in pursuance to her representations dated 16.04.2018 and 18.05.20'18 on account of the death of her husband, K. Jaganmohan Raju, General Mazdoor underthe 2nd respondent while in service, and also to settle all the amounts due to the petitioner arising out of the death of her husband while in service.
lA NO: 1 OF 201 I
Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the iepresentations made by the petitioner on 16.04.2018 and 18.0S.2018 for providing compassionate appointment to the petitioner in accordance ^/ith the policy of the company, pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: SRI P. SRt HARSHA REDDY (sc FoR StNGARENt COLLTERTES CO.LTD)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
trIRIT PETITION NO.21662 0F 2018
ORDER:
Today, when the matter istaken up, learned counselfor the petitioner submitted aletter dated 28.07.2023 fot withdrawal of thepresent writ petition and seekspermission of this Court to withdrawthe writ petition.
3.' Accordingly, the writpetition isdismissedas
withdrawn. Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pending in this
writ petition shall stand closed.No costs.
SD/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGTS;I{AR //TRUE COPY// {.' SECTION OFFICER
To,
BN
GJP
?n^2..
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310812023
ORDFR
WP.No.21662 of2018
/:. iJ .l ,-; S iA7 ..t'
lc 17 AIJE2M
,.
"_/-,
t: t
DTSMISSING THE WRITPETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
?+l^, r+\e[>r
K. Bhavani
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd
The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd
J Ch. Hanumantha Raju
K. Sunitha
K. Vanitha
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
