The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging selection keys for Junior Panchayat Secretary posts as infructuous because the petitioner had withdrawn the matter or the subject became moot during hearing.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 47022 OF 20'18
Between:
Shaik Bahseer, S/o: Chandmiya, Aged 27yearc, Occ. Unemployed,Rl/o. 8- 107, Madhavaram (Kalam) Village, Shaligauraram Mandal, Nalgonda District- 508210. Hall Ticket No.3409168.
...PET]TIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus to declare the erroneous final keypertainingto QuestionNos. 38, 42, 46, and 68 of Paper 2 of Question Paper Booklet Set-4 of the Petitioner issued by the 2nd Respondent in respect of selection and appointment of Junior Panchayat Secretary posts pursuant to the Notification No.2560/CPR and RElB2l2017 , dt. 31-08-201 8 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14 and1 6 of Constitution of lndia and also direct the 2nd Respondent hereinto set asidethe answer of final key in respect of QuestionNos. 38, 42, 46, and68 of Paper2 of Question Paper Eooklet Set-4 of the Petitionerand toconsequentlydirect the 2nd Respondent to revaluate and reset the final key in respect of Question Nos.38, 42, 46, and 68 of Paper 2 of Question Paper Booklet Set-4 ofthe Petitioner and
award marks a(; )(.c in(lly and also consider the ( ase )f th() Petitioner for appointment c f Ju 1 )r P:tnchayat Secrc)tary aS per hiS rrerit
lA NO: 1 OF 201ti
Petition un.e :ierltion 151 CPC praying that in rhe circrrms.ances stated in the affidavit filed rr rupport of the pe,titron, the High Ccurt nrrry be pleased to Stay of all further oro:e.din1ls pursuant to the selection itnc al[)oin.ment of Junior Panchayat Secre,la y posts vide Notrfi(tation No.25r)0/Cp? anC RElB2l2O17, dt. 31- 08-2018 pe rr irg ,lrsposal of the main Writ Petititrn.
Counsel for the Pet tioner: SRl. G. SATYANARAYANA YADqV
Counsel for the Rtes pondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GEl.lERAl.
The Court made the following: ORDER
,r'
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.47O22 OF tAiB-..
ORDER:
Today u,hen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous.
dismissed as lnfructuous
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT-IREGISTRAR r\ i
SECTION OFFICER
To,'1. One CC to Sri. G. Satyanarayana Yadav, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to The Additional Advocate General of lndia, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad[OUT
TJ GJP
Prnq.
HIGH COURI
DATED:0310t l1r-023
r(-- S1'Ar(- o
U'
(
i,7 P<br>.' 2! 2il8
a,/
) ,i,
ORDER
WP.No.470it2 of 2018
DISMISSING'I'HE WP
AS INFRUC IIOUS
WITHOUT CC STS.
@{^r^. r-\el-3
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Bahseer
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner, Panchayati Raj and Rural Development Department
The District Collector, Nalgonda District
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
