Disposed

Smt. D. Rajeshwari v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC27 Dec 2023WP/20665/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought writ relief declaring inaction on applications for land regularization illegal and void ab-initio. The Court disposed of the petition by directing respondents to consider applications and pass orders within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the petitioners' regularization applications dated 27.6.2008 and 1.10.2008 and pass appropriate orders within two months.

Smt. D. Rajeshwari Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH^{DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO TI-IOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'ALE SRI JUSTICE^{J. SREENIVASRAO}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO^{N NO: 20665 OF 2(X)9}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. D. Rajeshwari, W/o.^{D. Sham Rao Househld R/o. H.No.1-5-67,8udwel,} Raiendranaoar R.R. District.

¶9

Snit. f . Bhigyamma,^{W/o. T. Balram Household Fi/o.Peddamangalaram'} Moinabad Mandal, R.R. District.

¶10

Srt. S V. Varalaxmi,^{W/o. S. David Househoh Rl/o. 1-5-28, Budwel,} naienOianaoar mandal, R.R.^{District. (petitioners1,2,3 are Rep.by their} Cni,-r:iat Pow-er of Attorn Holder S. David S/o. Pentaiah,^{54 yrs, Business}

¶11

C[. V"ttrrr", W/o.^{Ch. Ramesh HouseholdNo- 8-2-293182/GTN/3tuFF'} Film Nagar, Goutham Nagar,^{Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.}

¶12

...pETt,oNERS

¶13

AND

¶14

The Government of Andhra^{Pradesh, Rep,. by the Principal Secretary,} Revenue^{(Assign.I I I} ) Department,^{Secretariat, HLderabad.}

¶15

The Chief'Com-missionei-. Land Administration,,^{Government of Andhra} Pradesh, Nampally Station^{Road, Hyderabad.}

¶16

J rnJOistiict Collecior, Hyderabad^{District Nampally, S.tationRoad,Hyderabad'} 4 The Tahsildar, Sahikfet'Tahsil,^{RoadNo'2, Banjara Hills,Hyde_rabadoNDENTS}

¶17

Petition under Article²²⁶ of^{lhe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate writ order^{or directionparticularly one in the nature} of writ of f\Iandamus^{by declaringthe inaction of the respondents 'l ,2,3,in} disposing the applications^{of the petitoners filed on dl. 27 -6-2008and1 -10-2o08} vide Fite Nos⁽¹⁾ 12t1531OtO8^{(2) 12t17581108(3) 12117582108(411211729Ot08} for regularization in^{respect of the land in sy.No.10211of HakimpetVillage,} Hyderabad District, corresponing^{to T.S.No. 5, Block J, Ward 12, of Hakimpet} Villageshaikpet,Tahsil,HyderabadDistrict,intermsofGOMsNol66 Revenue^(Ass. POT) Department^{dt., 16-2-2008 as illegal, arbitrary voidab-initio} and violative of^{Article 14 of constitution of lndia and principles of natural justice} and this Honble court^{maybe pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider} the applications^{filed by the petitioners dt.27-6-200A and 1-10-2008vide File Nos.}

¶18

(1) ',t2l1531OlO8 (2) 12t175Utja^{(3)12t17582to8} (4) 12l1729O|OB^for regularization in^{respectof the land in Sy No lO2l1} of Hakimpet Village, Hyderabad District,^{correspondingto T-S.No.5, BlockJ, Wardk 12' of Hakimpet} Village , Shaikpet,^{Tahsil' HyderabadDistrict,in terms of G'O'Ms'No'166} Revenue(Ass.PoT)Departmentdt.,16.2-200Sdisposeoffthematterbypassing appropriate orders^{in respect of the claim of the petitionersin respect of theii} lands,

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 200^{g(WPMP. NO: 26935 OF 2009}

¶20

Petition under^{Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased to direct} the 4th Respondent^{not to disposses from their respective land in which they are} in possession in sy.No.^{10211 of HakimpetVillage,HyderabadDistrict'} corresponing to^{T.S.No. 5, Block..J.',Ward 12' of HakimpetVillage , Shaikpet'} Tahsil, Hyderabad^{District, pending disposalof above writ petition}

¶21

NO: oF 200 MP. NO: 26936 OF²⁰⁰⁹

¶22

Petition under Section^{151 CPC} Pra^{ying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleaseddirect} the respondents^{1 to 3 to consider the applications filed by the petitionerdL.27-6-} 2008and1-10-2o0EvideFileNos-(1\12115310108(2\121,17581108(3| 12117582108^{(4) 12t172g}l18 for regularizationin respectof the land in Sy.No.} 1O2t1 ot Hakimpet^{village,Hyderabad District, corresponingto T.S.No. 5, Block} ,,J'., Wardk 12' of Hakimpet Village , Shaikpet, Tahsil' Hyderabad District, in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 166^{Revenue(Ass- POT) Departmentdt, 16-2-2008by passing} appropriate orders^{in respect of the claim of the petitioners in respect of their lands} Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI J- ASHVINI KUMAR}

¶23

Counsel for Respondents:^{GPFOR REVENUE}

¶24

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶25

HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEJ. SREENIVAS RAO}

¶26

WRIT PETITION^{No.2O665 of2OO9}

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

This writ^{petitionis filed seekingthe following relief:-}

¶29

"fo issue a wit^{orderor directionmorepartia)larlgone in} the nature of wit^{of mandamus, declaing tte inactionof the} respondents 1, 2 and^{3 indtsposing *te o,plico,tionsof the} petittoners fled^{on 27.6 2OO8and1.1O.2OO8uideFile Nos'(l)} t2/1ss1o/08.^{(2)12/17581/08, (3)12/17582/08and} (4)12/ 172s0/O8 for^{regulanzation in respectof tleland in} Sg.No.1O2/1^{ofHakimpet Vi\age,Hgderabad Distict'} corespondtng^{to TS.NoIBlock'J",Ward12 of HdktmPet} Vihage, Shaikpet^{T6.lsit, HgderabadDistict in temsof} c.O,lrfs.No. t66,^{Reuenue (Assn.POT)DePartment,dt 16'2'2008} as illegal, arbitrary,^{uoidab-initioanduiolatiueof Article 14 of} Constitutrca of^{Indo and pinciptesof natural justiceand this} Honble Courl^{mag be pleasedto direct the reWondents1 to 3} to consrcler^{theapplicqtions} filed^{bg tltepetttion'ers} dt.27.6.)Oo8^{an<lI.Ol.2O08uideFile Nos'(1)12/1531O/08'} e)12/^{17.;8ti08.(3)12/17s82/08 and F)12/17290/08 for} reqltlonzr.tLon in^{respect of the tandinSg'No'102/ 1of} H(Tkunpel Vlldge,^{HgderabadDistict, conespondirlgto} 'l'. S. No..>. Block 'J", Word 12 of Hakimpet ViUage,^Slla,ikpet Tahsrl,^I lyclerabad^{Dist.tct ntennsof O'O'Ms No'166'Reuenue} (Assn.POTl Department,^{dt-16-2.2008, disposeoff the matter} by passrtrg^{appropnate ordersin respect of the claim of the} petrtuorlers u1^{respectof their lands "}

¶30

Hearcl Sri^{J.Ashvini Kumar,learned counselfor the} petitioners and^{learned AssistantGovemment Pleader for} Revenr re gppearing^{on behalfof respondentNos' 1 to 4'}

¶31

¶32

l,earned counsel for the petitioners submits^that petitioners are the legal heirs of late M.Balaiah, who^was in possession and enjoyment of land to an extent of Ac.5.00 gts. in Sy.No. 102/ 1 of Hakimpet Village corresponding T.S.No.S, Block "J", Ward 12 of Hakimpet ViIIage, Shaikpet Tahsil, Hyderabad District in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 166, Revenue (Assn. POT) Department, dated 16.O2.2OO8. He also submits that pursuant to the said G.O.,^{petitionershave} submitted applications dated 27 .06.2008 and 0 1. 1O.20O8 to respondents requesting them to regularize the above said land and respondents have not taken any steps. At this stage, petitioners have approached this Court and ftled the present Writ Petition.

¶33

After perusal of the record, it reveals that this Court while admitting the Writ Petition on 24.O9.2OO9, granted interim direction in W.P.M.P.No.26936 of 2OO9 directing respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider the applications submitted by petitioners on 27.06.2OO8 and Ol.1O.2OO8, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.O2.2OOa. Inspite of the same, respondent Nos. I to 3 have not considered the applications submitted bv the petitioners till date.

¶34

¶35

¶36

l,earned Assistant Government^pleader submits that respondent Nos. I to 3 will consider the applications submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders, if not already considered and requested this Court to grant a reasonable time.

¶37

In view of the above submissions, w.ithout going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition, directing respondent Nos.l to 3 to consider the applications submitted by the petitioners dated 27.06.2008 and 01.10.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance u'ith law within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not already considered.

¶38

7 With the above direction, the Writ Petition is

¶39

disposed of. No costs

¶40

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

¶41

closed.

¶42

SD/- K. AMMAJI ASStsrANrVtr*,TRUE COPY//

¶43

¶44

SECTION OFFICER

¶45

To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Assign.lll) Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶46

The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration,, Government of^Andhra Pradesh, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad.

¶47

The District Collector, Hyderabad District Nampally, Station Road, Hyderabad

¶48

The Tahsildar, Sahikpet Tahsil, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad

¶49

One CC to Sri J Ashvini Kumar^Advocate [OPUC]

¶50

Two CCs to GP For Revenue,^High Court^for the State of^Telangana. [OUT]

¶51

Two CD Copies

MBC GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2711212023

1 HE 6T4I A
d oz tEB 2o2l
r1'
..2,'
*
k
.O4, .(.. rin I C

¶56

ORDER

¶57

WP.No.20665 of 2009

¶58

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶59

WITHOUT COSTS

¶60

@ofi* G bL

Smt. D. Rajeshwari v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. D. Rajeshwari v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Badiga Potharaju, Vs The joint Collector

Ms.N.Ramakantham, and 39 Otehrs Vs the Stateof a.P., and 7 Others

S.Ravi Kumar Vs The Tahasildar, Mandal Revenue office

Vallemchetla Krishnaiah, S/0. Late Hanumaiah, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Kodoor Ram Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Sreepada Sada Laxmi Vs The District Collector